2023 Conference – Science and Policy

2023 Conference – Science and PolicyLaura Bethany2024-03-18T19:58:32-04:00

Theme: Science and Policy

Symposiums:

Breakfast Session:

Breakfast Session Hosted by Concordia University

Conference Panels:

102: Dual-Use Research of Concern: Research Security for National Security

111: Transforming the assessment of research excellence

119: Indigenous Research Ethics: Our understandings and obligations as science and policy practitioners

120: The impact of major research facilities as national assets: Responding to the Report of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System

128: Aligning federal and provincial/territorial vision and action for a stronger Canadian health research system

183: Towards the adoption of diverse approaches to open access: Promoting the dissemination and use of knowledge across disciplines

804: Discussion between Dr. Mona Nemer and Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan

901: The new challenges of information in parliaments

910: Canada’s Quantum potential : critical partnerships and public policy to advance Canada’s leadership in Quantum science and technology.

Canadian Science Policy Centre
1595 16th Avenue, Suite 301
Richmond Hill, ON
L4B 3N9

E-mail:
info@sciencepolicy.ca

Subscribe to the Canadian Science Policy Conference newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest news, events and programs.

Panel 157

Mechanisms for Effective Science Advice in Public Health and Public Health Emergencies

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S1a - 157 - Symposium Health Policy Monday

Organized by: Public Health Agency of Canada
Speakers:
Bev Holmes
Dr. Niklas Bobrovitz
Dr. Paul Hébert
Dr. Sarah Viehbeck
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
At the intersection of knowledge and public health policy is science advice. This is true in steady state and heightened in emergencies. As the world reflects on the COVID-19 pandemic, the Public Health Agency of Canada, provincial public health agencies, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and academia are considering how to better foster linkages between experts, stakeholders, and policy makers; improve the ways that science advice is generated, contextualized, and communicated; and encourage the development equitable and effective public health actions. This panel aims to consolidate this thinking to support the maturation of science advice bodies for public health.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion was on public health science advice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The panelists, who include scientific leaders from public health agencies and research foundations, discuss lessons learned about providing timely and effective science advice to policymakers during public health emergencies. Key points raised include the importance of establishing clear mechanisms and structures for science advice at the outset of an emergency, managing jurisdictional differences in advisory approaches across provinces and territories, sustaining urgency and funding for science advice over the long course of a pandemic, and finding the right balance between science, policy, and politics when providing recommendations. The panelists reflect on innovations in science communication and evidence synthesis developed during COVID-19 that should be sustained. Overall, the discussion centers on how to optimize public health science advisory systems to enable evidence-informed policymaking during future public health crises.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

The conference featured panels on important health policy topics like public health emergencies, brain research, mental health stigma, and regenerative medicine.
Science advice plays a critical role at the intersection of policymaking and public health, as demonstrated during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Canada established various science advisory bodies during the pandemic that differed in structure, mandate, who they informed, etc.
The Public Health Agency of Canada is now evaluating the role and impact of science advice during public health emergencies.
Key challenges discussed were maintaining urgency long-term, managing differences across jurisdictions, and separating science from politics.
Innovations like rapid evidence reviews should be sustained beyond the pandemic to strengthen future emergency response.
Further work is needed to optimize science advisory mechanisms, coordination, and communication for future public health crises.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Establish a permanent, arm’s length science advisory body at the federal level to provide rapid, coordinated scientific guidance during public health emergencies. This body should have a clear mandate and be inclusive of diverse experts across disciplines.
Formalize processes for science advice to effectively inform decision-making in a timely manner, while maintaining scientific independence. This includes developing communication protocols between advisors and policymakers.
Ensure consistent representation of scientific advisors and coordination mechanisms across jurisdictions during national public health events. Provincial and territorial participation is key.
Sustain innovations from the pandemic that allowed for rapid mobilization of science advice, such as virtual meetings and accelerated peer review.
Proactively develop a strategic plan for public communication of science advice during emergencies to build public trust and mitigate misinformation.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 123

Brain Research: The cornerstone for Canada’s future social-economic wealth

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S2a - 123 - Symposium Health Policy Monday

Organized by: Canadian Brain Research Strategy
Speakers:
Cedric Bisson
Dr. Allison B. Sekuler, PhD, B.A
Dr. Javeria Hashmi, PhD
Dr. Michael D. Hill
Dr. Rose Goldstein
James N. Reynolds
Julian Karaguesian
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Understanding the brain is vital for Canada’s success and well-being in the 21st century. Join us to explore the current state of brain research, recent advancements, and emerging technologies in Canada and globally. Discover the profound impact of brain disorders on Canadians and the compelling health, economic, and societal benefits of investing in brain research. Learn about the need for a coordinated and strategic approach, with government support for cross-sectoral collaboration and partnerships. Together, we can drive evidence-based policy change to unlock the transformative potential of brain research and secure a prosperous future for Canada.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists underscored the importance of brain research for Canada’s future prosperity. They noted Canada’s strong history in neuroscience contributions but emphasized the need to advance research further through greater collaboration, data sharing, and coordinated strategy. Key focus areas discussed were imaging, MS, stroke, chronic pain, and leveraging computational tools. The economic and social burden of brain disorders was raised to stress the value of research investment. The panel advocated for a national brain research strategy to set collective goals, consolidate infrastructure and funding, and bolster support for the sector overall. There was emphasis on translating innovations to patients and working across disciplines. The main concepts conveyed were that brain research is vital for Canada’s future, has seen important progress but requires expanded partnerships and coordination to maximize impact.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Canada has a strong history of contributions to neuroscience research and treatment innovations, but more coordination and investment is needed.
Imaging, MS, and stroke treatment are areas where Canadian neuroscientists have made recent advances.
Chronic pain remains a major challenge, but new computational tools create opportunities for progress.
Data sharing and collaboration across sectors is critical to maximize impact of brain research.
Brain disorders have major economic and social costs, highlighting the need for more research investment.
A coordinated national brain research strategy could help advance goals, infrastructure, and funding.
Innovations in brain science need to be effectively translated to improve patient outcomes.
Support and funding for the brain research sector should be increased to maintain and build on strengths.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Develop a coordinated national brain research strategy to align goals, consolidate infrastructure and funding, strengthen training, and support collaboration across sectors. This will accelerate progress and strengthen Canada’s leadership in neuroscience.
Increase investment in neuroscience research commensurate with the massive health and economic burdens of brain disorders. Funding should support the full pipeline from basic to clinical to translational research.
Prioritize research data sharing and open science practices. Create platforms and incentives that allow researchers to share data, resources, and findings freely.
Focus research efforts on promising areas such as imaging, computational tools, MS, stroke, chronic pain, and others where Canada excels or has urgent needs.
Strengthen knowledge translation so innovations reach patients more quickly. Engage end-users in research and streamline regulatory and economic barriers to adopting new therapies.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 105

Law, Public Policy and Social License for Next-Generation Regenerative Medicine Technologies

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S5a - 105 - Symposium Health Policy Monday

Speakers:
Dr. Amy Zarzeczny
Dr. Krishana Sankar
Dr. Sowmya Viswanathan
Dr. Ubaka Ogbogu
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
The panel explores three aspects of regenerative medicine (RM) governance in Canada, which play a critical role with respect to public trust in RM and the strength of its social license, including: (1) developing and strengthening governance policies for global and inclusive translation of RM innovation; (2) promoting good governance for the clinical adoption and delivery of RM innovation through professional regulation of healthcare providers; and (3) understanding and combating misinformation and disinformation as they relate to RM research, development, dissemination, and utilization. The panel aims to discuss law and policy developments that will impact next generation advanced scientific technologies.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists discussed challenges and opportunities related to law, policy, and communication for regenerative medicine in the Canadian context. A key theme was the need to balance safety, innovation, and access in the regulatory approach to new cell and gene therapies. Specific issues raised included classifying therapies as drugs creating barriers to research, policy often being reactive without nuance, and challenges with international harmonization. The importance of accurate science communication to address misinformation and manage public expectations was emphasized. Perspectives highlighted the need to consider diverse global contexts in policymaking for technologies with international reach. Overall, the discussion centered on optimizing governance frameworks to enable responsible clinical translation of regenerative medicine by integrating perspectives from law, policy, ethics, science communication, and diverse global communities.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Canada’s regulatory policy classifying minimally manipulated autologous cell therapies as drugs creates barriers for clinical research and translation. New regulations are hoped to address these issues.
Community partnerships and public engagement are critical to address health impacts of stem cell therapy misinformation. Ongoing work by groups like Science Up First debunk misinformation.
Balancing hope and hype in science communication around regenerative medicine is an ongoing challenge. Funding accurate public information dissemination is important.
Involving diverse global perspectives in policy development is limited currently in Canada. This can undermine policy effectiveness for global scientific issues.
International harmonization of regulations and enabling participation in the global regenerative medicine field are challenges with Canada’s current inward policy focus.
Differentiating therapies in policy responses, instead of blanket restrictions, remains a challenge in Canada that needs improvement.
Social license and public trust are key challenges for clinical translation and uptake of next generation regenerative therapies.
Developing governance frameworks that enable regeneration medicine innovation while ensuring safety and efficacy is an ongoing policy challenge.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Regulators should take a nuanced, proportional approach to regulating cell therapies based on risk levels, to enable innovation while protecting patients.
Policymakers should increase funding for public outreach and science communication to provide accurate information on new therapies directly to the public.
Researchers and regulators should partner with patient advocacy groups and community organizations to understand public perceptions and concerns around new technologies.
Canada should take a global perspective when developing policies, learning from international best practices and considering implications for harmonization and participation in the global ecosystem.
Policymakers need to regularly review regulations to ensure they reflect the latest scientific understanding and differentiate between types/risk levels of therapies.
More inclusive deliberation is needed in policy development, bringing in diverse voices and perspectives from different disciplines, sectors and geographies.
Invest in training clinicians on new regenerative medicine approaches to build healthcare capacity and enable appropriate access for patients.
Incentivize industry-academic collaboration and create sandboxes for controlled evaluation of innovative therapies before wide deployment.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 116

STEM Moms Project

Organized by: University of Calgary
Speakers:
Julie Hawco
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Understanding the intersectionality of women in STEM and working parents is critical to maintaining a healthy STEM professional pipeline. The STEM Moms Project, a year-long focus group on this novel topic, examined how motherhood contributes to the loss of mid-career women in STEM and recommends these actions: 1) Increased Support Programs Specific for STEM Mothers; 2) Solutions for Allyship, Advocacy & Action, which include Safe Environment, Leadership, and Mentorship supports, and Workplace Guidelines; 3) Transformational Changes for Society, including continuous career assessment and work-life integration and increased focus on unrecognized leaders and dual career families.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Burnout culture makes it very difficult for working mothers in STEM to balance high demands at work and at home. This is still a major issue.
Mental load of managing home and family responsibilities on top of a demanding STEM career leads to stress and burnout. This persists as a challenge.
Career gaps due to extended parental leave can make it very difficult for women to re-enter STEM fields. The stigma remains.
There is a lack of support systems for women in the middle of their STEM careers compared to early career and leadership levels. This gap in support still exists.
Allies like managers and co-parents can create a safe, flexible environment and provide mentorship to support working moms in STEM. More awareness is needed.
Regular self-assessments on how work integrates with life goals can help maintain work-life balance. This practice is not widespread.
Spotlighting and supporting “”untitled leaders”” in technical roles is key to retaining women in STEM. This message needs amplification.
Recognizing dual-working parent households is important to value mothers in the workplace and fathers at home. The focus remains on working mothers.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Provide more support groups and resources for women in the middle of their STEM careers, when many face challenges related to motherhood and work-life balance. This will help retain women in STEM fields.
Encourage allies like managers, coworkers, and partners to create safe and flexible work environments. This includes allowing accommodations, avoiding assumptions, demonstrating vulnerability, and supporting work-life integration.
Have employees conduct annual self-reviews on how their work supports their life goals, not just company goals. This will build the reflex to assess work-life fit.
Promote the idea of work-life integration from the start of careers. Experience shows most learn to balance work and life through difficult trial-and-error. Early lessons would help.
Spotlight and value technical experts who find fulfillment in their work without pursuing management roles. This “”untitled leadership”” allows sustainability.
Discuss dual-working parent households more, not just working mothers. This values fathers’ roles at home and mothers’ roles at work.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 126

Responsible conduct of research through an accessibility and inclusion lens

Organized by: CNIB
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speakers:
Ainsley Latour
Ana Sofia Barrows
Andy Livingston
Dr. Bonnielin Swenor
Dr. Mahadeo Sukhai

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
This panel will focus on understanding the importance of, and draft recommendations for, establishing a national framework for the accessibility and inclusivity of research methods and practices within academic and community research settings. One of the goals of the research project to be discussed is to identify potential best practices to be included in the framework. The focus is to establish how such a framework can lead to cultural and attitudinal change toward inclusive research methods. The panel will discuss how researchers ensure privacy and consent to participation within research is respected and considered throughout the research process and ethics.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists engaged in a thoughtful discussion about the need for a national framework to promote accessibility and inclusivity in research. They explained how such a framework could address unconscious biases and make research more equitable. Intersectionality, privacy, consent, and changing attitudes around disability were highlighted as crucial considerations. The panelists provided examples of current barriers and biases that limit participation and skew results. There was emphasis on the fact that disability is viewed differently across cultures. Developing an accessible conference toolkit was presented as one strategy to increase inclusion. Overall, the panelists made a compelling case that the research community has more work to do to dismantle ableism and ensure studies reflect diverse perspectives. They called for continued effort to implement systemic changes through an ethical national framework.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a need for a national framework to promote accessibility and inclusivity in research in order to address unconscious biases. This would help make the research system more equitable.
Consideration of disability issues globally reveals differences in approaches between countries. A unified framework could help align efforts internationally.
An intersectional lens is critical identities intersect in experiences of oppression. The framework must account for this complexity.
Ethical considerations around accessibility and inclusion need to be integrated throughout the research process in a thoughtful manner.
Accessibility and inclusivity need to be embedded at every stage from forming research questions to disseminating findings.
Researchers with disabilities face specific challenges that a framework should address through guidance and requirements.
Unconscious biases persist and limit progress towards equitable, accessible research. Awareness and education are still needed.
Calls to action emphasize the importance of advancing this work through policy and collaborative efforts. Momentum is building.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Develop a national framework and guidelines for accessibility and inclusivity in research to address biases and barriers. This should provide standards and best practices for equitable, ethical research.
Increase international collaboration and perspective to understand how disability is viewed and addressed globally. This can identify effective policies to adopt.
Incorporate intersectionality when examining accessibility and inclusivity, considering how multiple marginalized identities intersect.
Implement strategies like consent processes that respect privacy and agency of disabled research participants.
Change attitudes and confront ableism through education and exposure. Research culture must value accessibility and inclusion.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 127

Bridging the Gap: Addressing Inequities in STEM for a Sustainable Future

Organized by: SCWIST
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speakers:
Ainsley Latour
Andrea Doucet
Commissioner Kadie Ward
Dr. Melanie Ratnam
Dr. Naheda Sahtout
Dr. Poh Tan
Harmy Mendoza

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
It is projected that upwards of 70% of future jobs will require STEM knowledge. As we usher in the digital era, this means that existing inequities must be addressed to prevent their potential exacerbation. This panel will explore factors contributing to these inequities and stimulate discussion on policy change, education strategies, and industry initiatives to bridge the gap in access and opportunities to pursuing a career in STEM. Key areas of focus will include: IDEA, Pay Equity, Education & Leadership, Childcare, and GBV.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists addressed systemic barriers facing women and other underrepresented groups in STEM fields. Issues discussed included the gender pay gap, lack of diversity and inclusion in STEM education and workplaces, insufficient childcare support, gaps in STEM leadership representation, and workplace gender-based violence. Speakers advocated for policy changes like pay equity legislation, improved parental leave, increased education accessibility and accommodations, indigenous knowledge incorporation, and proactive accountability measures. However, they emphasized that policy alone is insufficient without accompanying culture change in workplaces and society. Conceptually, the panelists highlighted the need for intersectional approaches considering how multiple marginalized identities compound barriers. They called for community-driven solutions and systems-level changes to transform STEM into an equitable, inclusive, and safe sector for all.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Pay equity is still a major issue, with women often underpaid in female-dominated roles. Ontario’s Equal Pay Act aims to address this through gender-neutral job evaluations.
Most of the gender wage gap arises after childbirth due to unpaid care work. Better parental leave policies are needed to support women in STEM fields.
STEM education faces challenges like lack of teacher training, varying curriculums, and inadequate funding/technology.
People with disabilities still face barriers in STEM education and careers. More accommodations are necessary.
Gender-based violence remains a serious issue facing women in male-dominated fields like STEM. Proactive approaches beyond policies are needed.
STEM leadership lacks representation from many equity groups like women, minorities, indigenous people and people with disabilities.
Community-driven policies, indigenous ways of knowing, and an accountability/safety culture are advocated to promote diversity in STEM.
Overall, while progress has been made, systemic barriers persist for women and other underrepresented groups in STEM fields. Continued action is needed for equity.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Implement the Equal Pay Act requiring employers to conduct gender-neutral job evaluations to address systemic undervaluation of female-dominated roles.
Continue advocacy until the gender wage gap is eliminated.
Expand parental leave policies to provide adequate paid time off for both parents after childbirth and adopt flexible work arrangements to support work-life balance, especially for mothers.
Increase STEM teacher training, coordinate curriculums across districts, and allocate more funding for classroom technology to strengthen STEM education, especially for girls and minorities.
Mandate accommodations in STEM higher education and workplaces for people with disabilities and provide resources to support their success.
Establish clear anti-harassment policies, reporting procedures, and accountability measures to address gender-based violence in STEM workplaces. Implement proactive training and culture change initiatives.
Diversify leadership by setting representation targets for women, minorities, Indigenous peoples, and other marginalized groups. Incorporate diverse perspectives and ways of knowing.
Adopt community-centered approaches to developing inclusive STEM policies and programs, partnering with advocacy groups like Swiss.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 166

Towards accessible and inclusive scientific conferences and meetings for trainees and researchers with disabilities: Priorities for achieving STEM equity

Organized by: University of Montreal
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speaker:
Dr. Bonnielin Swenor

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
People with disabilities remain significantly under-represented across the health and STEM ecosystem. There have been growing calls to better include disability within broader EDI efforts. This is especially pertinent within health and science disciplines which traditionally portray persons with disabilities through highly medicalized perspectives, often positioning members of the disability community as patients and recipients of care, rather than as experts who work alongside others. Leaders with disabilities bring vital lived experiences that significantly enhance research, policy and practice. This presentation will foreground the conference experiences of researchers and trainees with visual impairments, highlighting barriers, proposed solutions, and future priorities.

Summary of Conversations:
The speaker discusses making scientific conferences and meetings more accessible for people with disabilities, particularly those with vision impairments. She shares data showing underrepresentation of people with disabilities in STEM fields and in research funding. She helped create a toolkit for conference organizers to make events more accessible, including choosing accessible venues, providing materials in accessible formats, offering accommodations, and incorporating accessibility features during the event like captions, audio descriptions, and high contrast slides. The speaker emphasizes that accessibility benefits many groups beyond just people with disabilities, and that it is everyone’s responsibility, not just people with disabilities, to make STEM fields more equitable and inclusive. She argues accessibility is key to advancing participation and representation of people with disabilities in STEM.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Less than 3% of STEM workers in the US have a disability, and this number has not improved in over a decade.
People with disabilities are significantly underrepresented in STEM fields and at scientific conferences.
Inaccessible conferences are a major barrier to participation and career advancement for people with disabilities.
A toolkit provides practical tips for improving conference accessibility, covering planning, during the event, and follow up.
Venues should meet legal accessibility standards at minimum, and aim to go beyond the legal minimum.
Websites, forms, materials should be accessible, with plain language summaries.
Provide accommodations like large print name tags, venue tours, captions and audio descriptions.
Accessibility benefits many groups beyond people with disabilities, and is everyone’s responsibility to implement.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Select venues with barrier-free access that meet or exceed accessibility laws and regulations.
Make conference/meeting websites, forms, materials, etc. accessible for screen readers and provide plain language summaries.
Offer accessible versions of agendas, presentations, maps, posters (large print, high contrast).
Ask attendees ahead of time if they need accommodations.
Provide accommodations at the event like large print name tags, venue tours to help with navigation, keep spaces clear for access.
Have captioning and audio descriptions available during presentations.
Keep presentation slides simple (large font, high contrast) and describe images/videos/graphs/tables.
Share accessible presentation copies with attendees.
Remember accessibility is key to advancing STEM equity and is everyone’s responsibility.
Apply accessibility recommendations not just to conferences but meetings and events of all sizes.
Make accessibility a priority in all planning to create more inclusive scientific communities.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 103

Developing Research Infrastructure with and for the Canada’s Northern Research Community

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S17a - 103 - Symposium Indigenous North Mo

Organized by: University of Alberta
Speakers:
Andrew Applejohn
Dr. Bronwyn Hancock
Dr. Gwen Healey Akearok
Dr. Roseann O’Reilly Runte
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
This multidisciplinary panel will discuss the issue of research capacity development in Northern Canada by focusing on the contribution of research infrastructures. The panel will invite a discussion about how to support research focused on Northern issues, done by researchers and institutions in the North, and for the benefit of Northern communities. The panel will invite an overview of current endeavours to provide Northern researchers and institutions with the tools and facilities they require to advance science from a Northern perspective, including how to encourage the development of Traditional Indigenous Knowledge and science through access to the facilities and equipment associated with a western scientific model.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists discussed developing research infrastructure in Canada’s North that is community-led, respects Indigenous knowledge, and involves Northerners. They highlighted the shift from federal to territorial and Indigenous control over research in recent decades. Examples were provided of health research guided by Inuit communities in Nunavut, changes to research infrastructure in the Northwest Territories, and Yukon University’s mandate to incorporate Indigenous knowledge. The speakers emphasized flexible spaces that support traditional knowledge, inclusion of Northerners in all aspects of research, investment in both physical infrastructure and Indigenous capacity building, and retaining Northern scientists. An audience member raised the idea of portable research infrastructure. Overall, the panel advocated for research infrastructure that is community-driven, centered on Indigenous ways of knowing, and aims to build Northern research capacity.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

The Haukigartic Health Research Center in Nunavut takes a community-led approach to research, working closely with local communities.
Research infrastructure in the Northwest Territories has shifted from federal to territorial control over the past 30 years. Indigenous governments are now more involved.
Yukon University’s legislation requires respect for Indigenous knowledge. The university is developing new research infrastructure.
Flexible research spaces can support traditional knowledge development in the North.
It’s critical to include Northerners in all aspects of Northern research projects.
Investment is needed in both physical research infrastructure and support for Indigenous communities and leaders.
Retaining Northern scientists long-term and developing portable research infrastructure could provide benefits.
Overall, research in the North is transitioning to greater community control and engagement, but continued effort and investment is needed.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Invest in flexible, portable research infrastructure that can support traditional knowledge development in remote Northern communities. This will enable community-led research grounded in Indigenous ways of knowing.
Ensure Northerners are involved at all stages of research projects, from design to implementation to knowledge sharing. Their perspectives and priorities must shape the research.
Alongside investments in physical infrastructure, provide resources and training to build capacity among Indigenous leaders, communities and organizations to conduct their own research.
Develop strategies to train and retain Northern scientists with ties to their home communities. This local talent pipeline will produce research that serves local needs.
Create spaces for open dialogue between academic and Northern partners to co-develop research projects rooted in mutual understanding and shared authority over the process.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 121

Decolonizing science, technology, and innovation policy – barriers, opportunities and new knowledge systems

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S16a - 121 - Symposium Indigenous North Mo

Organized by: MITACS
Speakers:
Brandon Meawasige
David Plamondon
Dr. Rahina Zarma
Genievieve Borg
Joseph Torres
Ryan Jimmy
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Science, technology, and innovation (STI) are foundational to advancing society – they provide new ideas, inventions, evidence, and knowledge essential to the development of any society. Because of this crucial role of STI, it is important that STI policy is inclusive and acknowledges how legacies of historical inequities will perpetuate themselves until there is an intervention. Towards this end, Indigenous scholars, practitioners, and activists have been advocating the need to embed decolonial and anti-racist knowledge and praxis into science and innovation policy. Essentially, how do we decolonize STI policy and advance reconciliation? This panel attempts to respond to that question. The panel will share insights from Indigenous scientists, innovators, funders, and incubators – across the continuum of innovation.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists explored systemic barriers and challenges that prevent indigenous youth from fully participating and succeeding in science, technology, and innovation fields. A major theme was the need to redefine success and innovation not just in financial terms but grounded in indigenous values of community, relationships, and reciprocity. The panelists discussed the importance of addressing barriers holistically by providing wraparound supports centered on indigenous ways of knowing. This includes creating physical and cultural spaces that make students feel safe, understood, and connected. Multiple panelists emphasized the need to build pipelines and expose indigenous youth to innovation opportunities earlier through programs tailored to their communities. There was also discussion on how non-indigenous allies can support indigenous innovation through building trust, relationships, and understanding different concepts of time and sustainability. Overall, the panelists explored how centering indigenous worldviews and redefining success could improve inclusion in innovation fields and inform discussions on Canada’s innovation performance.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Indigenous students face systemic barriers like mental health issues, financial constraints, and cultural disconnect that prevent them from pursuing education and innovation opportunities.
There is a need to address these barriers early in the education system to create more supportive environments for indigenous youth.
Organizations like SIIT are developing talent pipelines and accelerator models specifically tailored to support indigenous innovators and entrepreneurs.
Programs should center indigenous ways of knowing and values like holism and community in their design and delivery.
Wraparound supports like cultural spaces and activities are critical for helping indigenous students feel a sense of belonging and purpose.
Partnerships between indigenous and non-indigenous groups can help shift mindsets and build trust if done respectfully.
Funding models need to provide financial support tailored to individual student needs, not just tuition.
Bringing people together facilitates relationship building which is key for creating systemic change.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Create more programs like the mobile maker lodge that bring technology and STEM opportunities directly to First Nations communities in a culturally grounded way. This facilitates intergenerational knowledge sharing.
Support the growth of indigenous student centers and spaces on campuses that provide community, cultural grounding, and wraparound supports. Activities that connect students to indigenous arts, crafts and culture are impactful.
Take an assets-based approach that starts with understanding indigenous values and what communities identify as needs rather than imposing outside solutions. Center indigenous ways of knowing.
Bring indigenous and non-indigenous groups together to build relationships and trust over time through shared experiences and dialogues.
Address financial barriers in a holistic, personalized way that considers individual student needs beyond just tuition support.
Work with indigenous partners, students and communities to redefine success in culturally meaningful ways, beyond just western measures.
Create more talent pipelines and career pathways for indigenous youth from an early age to pursue innovation and technology.
Develop advisory councils and ongoing dialogues to help shift organizational values and worldviews to be more inclusive of indigenous perspectives over time.
Build more partnerships between indigenous and non-indigenous organizations based on trust and understanding.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 133

Braiding Indigenous and western knowledge to strengthen scientific research.

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S15a - 133 - Symposium Indigenous North Mo

Organized by: Maliseet Nation Conservation Council
Speakers:
Dr. Aruna Jayawardane
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Increasingly researchers are compelled to bridge Indigenous knowledge systems with Western scientific approaches to understanding natural processes. In this presentation, we will discuss the importance of Indigenous knowledge to strengthen the mainstream knowledge to better understand the biology and ecology of Species at Risk (SAR) in the Wolastoq (St. John River), New Brunswick. Studies were conducted in the Wolastoq to understand the distribution and ecology of Atlantic salmon and the short-nose sturgeon informed by the Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) of Maliseet elders/knowledge keepers. TEK has been instrumental to identify spawning and nursery areas, and migration routes of two species studied.

Summary of Conversations:
Two studies conducted by the Maliseet Nation Conservation Council that incorporated indigenous knowledge into scientific research were discussed. The first studied habitat use changes of shortnose sturgeon in the St. John River after dam construction, using interviews with elders and eDNA sampling. The second gathered traditional ecological knowledge about significant species and activities in the river area. It was emphasized that indigenous and western scientific knowledge systems are mutually beneficial. While western science is good for understanding the current situation, indigenous knowledge provides historical context. Combining them can produce valuable insights for research.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Indigenous knowledge and western science are two mutually beneficial knowledge systems that can be braided together.
Western science is effective for understanding the current situation through protocols and methods.
Indigenous knowledge provides historical context and a longitudinal perspective.
Combining indigenous knowledge and western science brings complementary strengths to address research questions.
The study on sturgeon habitat use showed elders’ knowledge helped identify important spawning and nursery areas.
The study gathering ecological knowledge documented historical salmon fishing sites, migratory routes, spawning grounds to inform recovery efforts.
Biomonitoring with eDNA was used to detect sturgeon populations above and below the dam.
Interviews with indigenous communities documented traditional activities and species of significance along the river.
Maps were created showing fishing areas, spawning grounds, migratory routes from indigenous knowledge.
The indigenous knowledge gathered was used by DFO to inform recovery potential assessment for Atlantic salmon.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Continue to conduct interviews with Indigenous elders to gather traditional ecological knowledge about species, habitats, and activities in the Wallistuk/St.
John River area. This historical information is invaluable for understanding changes over time.
Use both Indigenous knowledge and Western scientific methods, like eDNA sampling, to monitor current sturgeon populations and identify critical habitats.
Combining both knowledge systems provides a more complete picture.
Build ongoing partnerships between Maliseet First Nations communities and government agencies to co-develop research projects and share knowledge. This ensures Indigenous voices are included.
Expand Indigenous knowledge gathering to other species and river areas beyond those already studied. The salmon research shows the value of traditional knowledge for species recovery efforts.
Train more community members in scientific techniques like eDNA sampling to increase two-eyed seeing capacity and opportunities for Indigenous leadership in research.
Share findings back with communities and incorporate into government decision-making, like the salmon fishing closure, to recognize Indigenous rights and knowledge.
Secure multi-year funding to sustain collaborative Indigenous knowledge and Western science research programs, not just short-term projects. Long-term efforts build relationships, skills and mutual understanding.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 155

Tools for Braiding Indigenous and Western Knowledges

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S18a - 155 - Symposium Indigenous North Mo

Organized by: CMN
Speakers:
Aleesha Tearl Jones
Dr. JA Morrow
Dr. Paulina Johnson
Tiffany Traverse
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Organised by the Canadian Mountain Network, this panel will discuss the challenges of braiding Indigenous knowledges. Despite positive developments in the prioritisation and promotion of Indigenous-led research, Canadian institutions need to do more to support Indigenous researchers and their ways of knowing. The first half of this panel will address the systemic and structural problems faced by Indigenous researchers. The second half, in turn, aims to push the conversation forward by giving detail to the exact tools that are needed to braid the knowledges of multiple Nations with Western scientific methods and technologies.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists, who are indigenous women scholars and researchers, describe systemic barriers and emotional labor they face in bridging indigenous and western knowledges within academic institutions and research. A key theme is the complexity of indigenization efforts given the legacy of colonialism and ongoing racism. The panelists emphasize the emotional exhaustion of constantly having to educate non-indigenous people and argue initiatives need to reach higher administrative levels rather than just support centers. They highlight the critical need for non-indigenous people to move from allies to accomplices in confronting institutional racism and for funders to directly support indigenous-led research. Overall, the panel conveys this work is in early stages and full integration of indigenous knowledges requires honesty, accountability, and confronting ongoing systemic barriers indigenous academics and researchers experience.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Colonialism has created complexity and mistrust between indigenous and western sciences that persists today.
Young indigenous academics like Pauline face systemic barriers and have their capabilities doubted.
Tiffany left mainstream institutions to do independent land-based work, but faces funding barriers without academic partnerships.
Indigenous students like Alicia experience racism in academia, like being asked to justify colonization.
Pauline argues non-indigenous people must become accomplices rather than allies in confronting institutional racism.
Tiffany stresses that indigenous researchers should not have to do additional emotional labor to educate others.
Alicia says indigenous student supports are not enough indigenization must happen at higher institutional levels.
Pauline reiterates that academia is still in the early stages of integrating indigenous knowledges and worldviews.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Academic institutions must confront systemic racism and barriers that prevent indigenous academics from fully participating and being recognized for their capabilities. Non-indigenous people should act as accomplices, not just allies.
Funding agencies should remove barriers that prevent independent indigenous researchers from accessing support without forced academic partnerships.
Indigenous knowledge holders should be able to focus on their work.
Curricula and programs need to fully integrate indigenous knowledges and ways of knowing, not just add token components. This requires reaching higher administrative levels beyond just support centers.
Initiatives to indigenize the academy need to move beyond early stages and superficial efforts. True integration of indigenous epistemologies is required.
Non-indigenous students and faculty should educate themselves on the realities of colonialism and take responsibility for learning, rather than burdening indigenous students and colleagues.
Honest dialogues are needed to build trust and understanding, recognizing the exhaustion of constantly having to explain realities of systemic racism.
Accomplices should provide emotional support.
Institutions must implement anti-racist policies and training at all levels to create welcoming environments for indigenous students and faculty to thrive.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Breakfast Session

Hosted by Concordia University

Speaker:
Dr. Dominique Bérubé
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

See Panel Details

Summary of Conversations:
The panel covers an overview of Concordia University’s VoltAge project, which received $123 million in funding from the Canada First Research Excellence Fund. The goal of VoltAge is to support the electrification of Canadian society to help meet emission reduction targets. It will develop new technologies, create startups and support the electrification ecosystem, establish living lab demonstrations of net zero communities across Canada, and share knowledge nationally and internationally. The presentation emphasizes the need for climate action, acknowledging diversity in different communities, following indigenous leadership, focusing on prosperity and economic development, and providing excellent research training. Success will depend on attracting talent, building partnerships, achieving economic and societal impact through real-world demonstrations, and sharing knowledge.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

The Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF) represents a significant research investment by the federal government, around $200 million per year or 6% of the tri-agency budget.
The CFREF has a 7-year funding cycle and was recently evaluated after the first 5 years. Flexibility for institutions was appreciated but partnerships came too late in many projects.
For the latest CFREF competition, only 11 projects were funded across Canada. Success required demonstrating international leadership in a niche area.
Concordia’s winning proposal focuses on electrifying Canadian society through technologies, living labs, and sharing knowledge. Partnerships are critical.
Key principles include acting urgently on climate change, acknowledging regional diversity, following Indigenous leadership, and training the next generation.
Success will be measured by talent development, partnerships, economic impacts, societal benefits, and progress on decarbonization.
The academic community must support government efforts on electrification and emissions reductions to ensure continued reinvestment in research.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Develop partnerships early in the project to ensure industry collaboration and impact. This will facilitate technology transfer and commercialization.
Implement demonstration projects in diverse communities across Canada to showcase solutions and gain public buy-in. Success requires acknowledging regional differences.
Attract and train next generation researchers to build talent and leadership in electrification and net zero technologies. This ensures long-term impacts beyond the project timeline.
Track economic impacts and job creation to showcase benefits to governments and the public. This data supports continued investment in research and innovation.
Share knowledge internationally by creating partnerships with institutions pursuing similar goals. This positions Canada as a global leader in electrification.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 102

Dual-Use Research of Concern: Research Security for National Security

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 56a - 102 Wednesday, November 15th 1:15pm

Organized by: Defence Research and Development Canada
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023
Speakers:
Amr S. Helmy
Dr. Bessma Momani
Dr. Dugan O’Neil
Dr. Gitanjali Adlakha-Hutcheon
Lesley Soper
Nick Werstiuk

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Many emerging and disruptive technologies (EDTs) are dual-use, meaning they can have civilian and military, security or intelligence applications. Dual-use technologies and related early-stage dual-use research of concern (DURC) can accelerate economic and security opportunities, but they pose a risk to Canadian national interests if used by hostile actors or potential adversaries. This panel will seek to contextualize, raise awareness, and facilitate conversation surrounding the potential benefits and drawbacks of dual-use research. This includes discussions such as how to best pursue productive dual-use research that serves Canadian interests, how the Government of Canada views and approaches dual-use research opportunities, and guidance on the security considerations in managing these types of research efforts.

De nombreuses technologies émergentes et technologies de rupture (TE/TR) sont à double usage, c’est-à-dire qu’elles peuvent avoir des applications civiles et militaires, de sécurité ou de renseignement. Les technologies à double usage et la recherche préoccupante à double usage qui en découle peuvent accélérer les opportunités économiques et sécuritaires, mais elles représentent un risque pour les intérêts nationaux canadiens si elles sont utilisées par des acteurs hostiles ou des adversaires potentiels. Ce panel cherchera à contextualiser, à sensibiliser et à faciliter la conversation autour des avantages et des inconvénients potentiels liés à la recherche à double usage. Les panélistes discuteront notamment de la meilleure façon de mener des recherches à double usage productives qui servent les intérêts canadiens, de la façon dont le gouvernement du Canada considère et aborde les opportunités de recherche à double usage, et des conseils sur les considérations de sécurité dans la gestion de ces types d’efforts de recherche.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussed new government guidelines and restrictions on academic research partnerships that could raise national security concerns. A university representative explained their efforts to raise awareness across departments about evaluating research affiliations. There was debate around whether limiting international collaboration could hinder innovation versus protecting sensitive intellectual property. An industry perspective highlighted that unlike other countries, Canada lacks large domestic corporate partners to support emerging technology startups if academic partnerships are restricted. Concerns were raised about researchers of certain backgrounds facing extra scrutiny. The group considered whether risk assessment methodologies are robust enough to avoid defining restrictions too broadly. There was agreement that policies must balance security interests with supporting researchers and priority innovation areas through continued funding. Overall the discussion provided perspective to help shape policies that strengthen international collaboration.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

New guidelines on research partnerships and affiliations have created uncertainty and raised concerns among some researchers. Universities are working to interpret policies and advise faculty.
Restrictions aimed at addressing national security risks could have unintended impacts such as pushing researchers towards mediocrity or reducing international collaboration. Balancing security with innovation requires ongoing discussion.
Lack of large domestic industry partners limits support for emerging technology startups compared to other countries. Targeted funding is needed to fill gaps left by restricted international partnerships.
Ensuring policies and risk assessments are not defined too broadly or applied unevenly is important to avoid disproportionate effects on researchers of certain backgrounds.
Ongoing dialogue between policymakers, industry, academia and security agencies can provide perspective and help strengthen international collaboration in priority research areas.
Universities face new administrative burdens in advising faculty on evolving security protocols and assessing risks. Dedicated staff training is being implemented.
Almost any scientific or technological research could potentially raise dual-use concerns depending on context. Caution is required in applying definitions and restrictions.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Create an advisory committee with diverse representation to regularly review and provide guidance on ensuring security policies are appropriately scoped and balanced.
Increase funding and partnerships focused on priority technology areas impacted by collaboration restrictions to fill emerging gaps.
Develop new programs to support researchers and startups impacted by changes in eligible international partnerships and funding sources.
Expand training and support services at academic institutions to help researchers interpret and implement new guidelines appropriately.
Commission an independent study on potential unintended consequences of restricting international research collaboration.
Strengthen communication and outreach efforts to reassure concerned groups about fair and balanced implementation of new policies.
Create new incentives and programs to promote more domestic collaboration as an alternative to restricted international partnerships.
Establish an ombudsman office to support researchers in interpreting guidelines and appealing adverse decisions.
Increase engagement with ally countries to explore alternate collaborative frameworks that address security concerns.
Fund more research and analysis on defining and evaluating dual use risks to inform effective policymaking.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 111

Transforming the assessment of research excellence

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 37a - 111 - Tuesday, November 14th 1:30pm

Organized by: NSERC and Concordia University
Speakers:
Dr. Dominique Bérubé
Dr. Giovanna Lima
Dr. Karine Duhamel
Dr. Shohini Ghose
Kori St.Cyr
Professor Stephen Curry
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
This panel brings together experts from Canada and abroad to discuss the rapidly evolving concept of research excellence and the relatively slow pace of reformed research assessment implementation in Canada. Panelists will examine concrete ways in which research and academic excellence may be assessed, recognizing a broader range of contributions, valuing integration of Indigenous and other ways of knowing, and supporting collaboration with communities to determine research priorities. Addressing the actual barriers to research assessment reform in Canada, the panel will identify roles for post-secondary institutions and funding agencies, as well as specific actions required for progress.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion focuses on transforming how research excellence is assessed. The panelists emphasize moving beyond just outputs to consider broader dimensions like open science, interdisciplinary work, and community engagement. Challenges are raised such as differing university cultures, lack of clarity in definitions, and ensuring diverse voices participate. Strategies discussed include involving patients and communities in reviews, recognizing a range of contributions not just high impact publications, and analyzing impact retrospectively through case studies. Questions from the audience highlight issues around gatekeeping by funders and incorporating curiosity-driven research. The panelists acknowledge these challenges but encourage further action to redefine excellence as multi-dimensional, noting some promising initiatives underway. The discussion concludes by stressing the importance of continuing efforts to transform research assessment given its influence on norms and careers.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a need to move beyond just evaluating research outputs to considering broader dimensions like open science practices, interdisciplinary work, and societal impact.
Lack of clarity and consensus around how to define research excellence is a key challenge. Different groups have different criteria.
Changing assessment policies and cultures is complex given misaligned incentives and institutional inertia. Incremental changes may be more feasible than radical overhauls.
Ensuring historically excluded groups can participate in defining and assessing excellence is critical for equity. Efforts to include diverse voices are promising.
Evaluating researchers’ time usage and activities beyond publications could better capture excellence. However, more transparency may be controversial.
Impact assessment methods remain imperfect. Using case studies and retrospective analysis to trace long-term contributions may be more appropriate than short-term attribution.
Funding agencies and peer reviewers play an influential role in perpetuating traditional notions of excellence. Advocacy and pressure on these groups could spur change.
While systemic transformation is difficult, encouraging local experiments and networks focused on redefining excellence can gradually shift cultures.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Broaden definitions of research excellence beyond just outputs and impact to include equity, diversity, inclusion, open science practices, and contributions to knowledge. Assessments should use multidimensional criteria.
Actively engage diverse voices, including young scholars, community partners, and underrepresented groups, in redesigning assessment frameworks and processes to reduce biases.
Evaluate and potentially reform peer review processes, including scrutinizing gatekeeping tendencies and lack of reviewer diversity. Consider double blind reviews.
Encourage funders and universities to pilot and evaluate new holistic assessment models, drawing lessons from successful programs like the Dutch and Canadian examples.
Foster cultural shifts via policies, mandates, incentives, and showcasing examples, but allow flexibility for disciplines and institutions to contextualize changes. Avoid overly prescriptive universal solutions.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 119

Indigenous Research Ethics: Our understandings and obligations as science and policy practitioners

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 31a - 119 - Tuesday, November 14th 10:30am

Organized by: Health Canada
Speakers:
Dr. Cara Tannenbaum
Dr. Emily McAuley
Dr. Kyle Bobiwash
Dr. Zoe Todd
Mr. Justin Sigluk Milton
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
This panel is organized by Health Canada for the interdepartmental Indigenous Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (I-STEM) Cluster. The purpose of this panel is to explore and understand research ethics as a process, beyond existing procedures and mechanisms that govern the ethical conduct of research. The first half of the panel focuses on understanding the promising Indigenous research ethics practices as well as gaps and challenges in methodological considerations, and the second half highlights our obligations as federal science-policy practitioners for shifting research ethics practices with Indigenous participants and collaborators. This panel will be organized by Health Canada on behalf of the 15-member interdepartmental Indigenous Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (I-STEM) cluster. This panel is part of ongoing interdepartmental efforts to implement the UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights and priorities to inform and advance current research ethics approaches.

Summary of Conversations:
An Indigenous research ethics panel speaks about the need to incorporate Indigenous worldviews and community priorities into the scientific process. They argue that Western science has been shaped by Indigenous knowledge systems. The discussion focuses on the historical displacement of Indigenous peoples from traditional lands and the lack of hope in communities. Panelists emphasize the importance of establishing ethical research practices that respect Indigenous knowledges, build trust, and follow local protocols and laws. Questions from the audience lead to dialogue about improving cultural sensitivity training, rethinking credentials and accreditation, and developing community-driven solutions. The panelists note challenges in sustaining their work long-term within institutional constraints but aim to advance their initiatives through partnerships. The discussion concludes with reflections on timelines, relationships, and a trailer for an Indigenous-led science film.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Indigenous knowledge systems are valid ways of knowing that have informed and shaped Western science over time. There is a need to recognize this and incorporate Indigenous perspectives into research.
Cultural awareness training, following community protocols, and taking time to build relationships are key to conducting respectful research with
Indigenous communities. Scientists should learn about the nation’s unique laws before engaging in research partnerships.
The context of colonialism and displacement needs to be considered when working with Indigenous peoples. Research should focus on community priorities, strengths and self-determination.
Youth can play a role in interpreting cultural understandings and bridging knowledge systems. Intergenerational learning is important.
There is a need to develop new community-based metrics and ways of evaluating research, beyond just credentials and western standards of accreditation.
Impact and relationship-building are important outcomes to assess.
Current research ethics processes can be burdensome. Efforts are underway to embed Indigenous values and remove colonial aspects from these processes.
Understanding Indigenous cosmologies and worldviews can enrich scientific research. Scientists need to take the time to build relationships and learn from communities.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Create opportunities for cultural awareness training and education on the history of colonization for non-indigenous researchers before they engage with indigenous communities. This will build understanding and trust.
Evaluate research success based on relationship-building and community-defined goals rather than just academic metrics. Focus on impact over credentials.
Work to embed indigenous values and remove colonial aspects from research ethics processes. Make them more community-driven.
Take time to build relationships and trust with communities before initiating research partnerships. Let communities guide the pace.
Incorporate indigenous knowledge systems and cosmologies as valid and enriching forms of science. Seek co-development.
Consider community priorities and strengths when designing research studies. Make community needs central.
Acknowledge traditional lands and treaties at events and meetings. Recognize indigenous peoples’ connection to place.
Advocate for policy changes that enable new community-driven and indigenous-led research models focused on impact.
Examine legal barriers to collaboration such as competition laws.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 120

The impact of major research facilities as national assets: Responding to the Report of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 50a - 120 Wednesday, November 15th 10:30am

Organized by: Neutrons Canada
Speakers:
Dr. Art McDonald
Dr. Baljit Singh
Dr. Marcella Berg
Janet E. Halliwell
Kevin Fitzgibbons
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
This session will bring together policy experts, science administrators, researchers and other stakeholders to discuss the recommendations of the Report of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System concerning Major Research Facilities (MRFs). The Advisory Panel proposes a new paradigm, in which the government funds MRFs as a portfolio, and adopts a lifecycle approach from planning to decommissioning. The session will highlight the role of MRFs in tackling emerging research challenges and opportunities. It will also discuss how the recommendations will address issues such as MRF sustainability, optimizing benefits to Canada, and what more needs to be done.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion focused on the challenges and opportunities related to major research facilities in Canada. A key theme was the need for more stable, long-term funding frameworks and mechanisms to support facilities beyond short-term project cycles. Speakers emphasized these facilities should be regarded as national assets requiring strategic oversight. The importance of operational budgets was highlighted, not just capital investments. Coordinating access and utilization across distributed infrastructure networks was also discussed. Speakers noted the facilities enable world-class research talent and training. Recommendations included growing research budgets automatically, increasing visibility of facilities politically, and making a strong case to government on their importance. Overall, a sense of urgency was conveyed to implement improved funding models and governance to maintain Canada’s leadership in scientific infrastructure.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is broad agreement on the need for more long-term, stable funding for major research facilities in Canada. The current short-term funding cycles create challenges.
A strategic framework and increased visibility of major research infrastructure is important to make the case politically. These facilities should be regarded as national assets.
Better coordination between facilities and distributed networks is needed to maximize impact and accessibility. This includes support for casual users.
Training the next generation of researchers relies heavily on access to major facilities. More support is needed in this area.
There are concerns about maintaining Canada’s leadership and competitiveness globally if funding issues are not addressed urgently.
A portfolio approach should be taken to support different types of research infrastructure beyond just large facilities.
Involving other government departments beyond the research funding agencies could help in implementing roadmaps and strategies.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Establish a coordinated oversight body like Neutrons Canada to represent major facilities, make them more visible politically, and communicate funding needs.
Implement multi-year funding cycles of at least 5 years to provide stability and match facility planning timelines.
Index overall federal research funding to inflation or GDP growth to prevent erosion of budgets over time.
Develop a portfolio approach to research infrastructure that includes both major facilities and distributed networks.
Provide operational funding through programs like those run by Brain Canada in addition to capital investments.
Engage other government departments beyond the traditional research funding agencies to support major facility operations.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 128

Aligning federal and provincial/territorial vision and action for a stronger Canadian health research system

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 32a - 128 - Tuesday, November 14th 10:30am

Organized by: Health Research BC
Speakers:
Bev Holmes
Carole Jabet
Frédéric Bouchard
Stefan Leslie
Tim Murphy
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
A conversation among National Alliance of Provincial Health Research Organizations (NAPHRO) leaders, the Chair of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System, and audience participants.

The report of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System was released in Spring 2023. In this session, National Alliance of Provincial Health Research Organizations leaders and Advisory Panel Chair Dr. Frédéric Bouchard will explore the report’s recommendations. The premise of the discussion: to improve the health of Canadians through research, the federal system and provincial/territorial systems must align. Ultimately, it is in Canada’s provinces and territories that research is conducted, disseminated and implemented, and talent is developed. Input from the audience will be sought towards maximizing efforts across the country to strengthen research and innovation in Canada.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists discussed misalignments and inconsistencies between federal and provincial approaches to strengthening Canada’s health research system. They highlighted issues like disjointed funding timelines and reporting structures. Solutions proposed included developing an overarching national health research strategy to align priorities and desired outcomes, and focusing on achieving impact rather than just fulfilling institutional requirements. Other topics included research waste and inefficiencies, the need for better data sharing across provinces to enable research, and ensuring research reflects societal needs. There was emphasis on collaboration between different levels of government and stakeholders, building on successes, and being open to learning from what doesn’t work to avoid duplicating efforts. Engaging end users like patients in the research process was noted as important.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a lack of alignment between federal and provincial/territorial approaches to strengthening Canada’s health research system. Better collaboration and communication is needed.
Solutions should focus on desired outcomes rather than institutional requirements. Organize efforts around what you want to achieve.
Impact metrics should be shared, not used as competitive advantage. Focus should be on learning and sharing what works and what doesn’t.
Funding unpredictability and short timeframes lead to inefficiencies. More sustainable funding would allow for better long-term planning.
Involve end-users early and throughout the research process to ensure solutions are feasible and relevant. This helps reduce waste.
Data access across provinces and nationally is a major challenge. Lack of data sharing harms patient care and research productivity.
Public policy needs more agile approaches to health data use. Balance privacy with enabling research that serves the public good.
Engage graduate students, postdocs and other early career researchers in discussions. They have valuable insights on needs and how to strengthen the system.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Develop a national health research strategy to align priorities, funding, and infrastructure across jurisdictions. This would help address misalignments and “discontinuities”.
Use a collaborative, issue-based approach to bring together partners across sectors and jurisdictions. Focus on shared goals rather than institutional structures.
Rethink how we demonstrate research impact, emphasizing how research reflects societal needs rather than attribution to specific projects.
Address inefficiencies in research funding, including unpredictability and short timeframes, which can contribute to waste. Consider longer-term and more stable funding models.
Improve data sharing and access, particularly health data, across jurisdictions to enable research and innovation. Engage partners like the Health Data Research Network.
Involve students, trainees and early career researchers in discussions about research strategy and system improvements. Their insights are valuable.
Learn from private sector data practices as we aim to balance privacy, security and public good in data access policies. Explore data trust models.
Recognize research and innovation as national strategic priorities requiring whole-of-government collaboration, not just health agencies.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 183

Towards the adoption of diverse approaches to open access: Promoting the dissemination and use of knowledge across disciplines

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 23a - 183 ENG Monday, November 13th 2:30pm

Organized by: Érudit
Speakers:
Clare Appavoo
Gillian Lane-Mercier
Marin Dacos
Stefanie Haustein
Vincent Larivière
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
The Canadian research ecosystem finds itself at a turning point in the adoption of open access, and the choices made now will have major impacts in the years to come. Several approaches exist for an equitable and sustainable transition to open access, across different models adapted to the Canadian context and the diversity of research disciplines. We will bring together a panel of researchers, experts and scholarly publishing professionals to present these issues and propose concrete solutions rooted in the Canadian public policy tradition.

L’écosystème de la recherche canadienne se trouve à un moment déterminant pour le déploiement du libre accès, et les décisions prises auront des répercussions majeures pour les années à venir. Plusieurs approches existent pour une transition équitable et durable vers le libre accès, à travers des modèles adaptés à la réalité canadienne et à la diversité des disciplines de recherche. Nous réunirons un panel de chercheurs·euses, d’experts·es et de professionnels·les de la publication savante pour présenter ces enjeux et proposer des solutions concrètes, ancrées dans la tradition des politiques publiques canadiennes.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists discussed challenges and opportunities for open access publishing in the social sciences and humanities. A key theme was moving away from author-pays and subscription access models dominated by large commercial publishers towards diamond open access funded by institutions and governments. Concerns were raised about the inequities of article processing charges and the increasing volume of publications. Alternatives proposed included qualitative article assessments, valuing datasets and other research outputs, and editorial boards retaining control of journals. Ensuring responsible open data practices was noted as an infrastructure need. The growth of open access policies and funding in Europe was highlighted as a positive direction, though prestige perceptions were cited as a remaining obstacle. Overall, the panel advocated for collaborative efforts by governments, institutions, editorial boards and researchers to transition towards an open access ecosystem that is equitable, high-quality, and focused on knowledge sharing rather than quantitative metrics.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Diamond open access journals are growing, with over 30,000 currently, but more support is needed for infrastructure and sustainability.
APC-based open access has created inequities, with students and those in humanities unable to afford fees. Alternatives like diamond OA are needed.
Commercial publishers still dominate scholarly publishing, charging high costs despite open access requirements. Reducing their control is an ongoing challenge.
Quantitative metrics like publication counts have downsides. Qualitative peer review of select key works may be better for assessing research impact.
Including non-publication research outputs like datasets into assessment is important but challenging to implement.
Prestige concerns make getting researchers to publish in new diamond OA journals difficult initially.
Editorial boards maintaining control of journals and moving them from commercial publishers to open access is an important transition strategy.
Responsible open data sharing is critical but infrastructure and policies to support this are still developing.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Coordinate open access policies across Canadian funding agencies to send a unified message and simplify requirements for researchers. Develop consistent incentives and compliance monitoring.
Raise awareness of open access policies and available diamond open access publishing options among researchers. Many are still unaware of funder open access mandates.
Support development of diamond open access publishing platforms and journals to provide zero-cost options for authors. Funding and infrastructure are needed to scale these up.
Create a global coalition of stakeholders promoting diamond open access, potentially housed under UNESCO. This can coordinate advocacy and knowledge sharing internationally.
Develop strategies to make open access publishing more equitable, reducing dependence on APCs. Explore waivers and discounts for low-resourced authors.
Engage publishers constructively in transitioning subscription journals towards open access while containing costs. Read and publish agreements can be one approach.
Monitor growth in research outputs and adapt policies and infrastructure accordingly. The exponential increase in papers requires scalable systems.
Consider policy levers like open access mandates, financial incentives, and compliance monitoring to drive culture change towards open research practices.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 804

Discussion between Dr. Mona Nemer and Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan

Organized by: Office of the Chief Science Advisor of Canada
Speakers:
Dr. Alejandro Adem
Dr. Mona Nemer
Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
This year’s CSPC opening panel will bring together two of North America’s most recognized science leaders for a discussion about their experience in the Canadian and U.S research landscape. Panelists will discuss the importance of societally-relevant science, broadening participation in science, the increasing need for open science, and science & technology in green economic development, as well as their vision for the role of science in international relations.

Summary of Conversations:
The speakers discussed the importance of fundamental scientific research and open science practices for addressing major societal challenges like the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, and human health. They emphasized having humility about future needs and continuing basic research even when applications are unclear. Enabling global collaboration through open science was positioned as critical for solving global issues like climate change. Increasing diversity and inclusion in STEM fields, especially for marginalized groups like indigenous peoples, was highlighted as an area for improvement. The role of science diplomacy in international relations arose as an important theme. Questions from the audience touched on issues of research funding disparities between institutions, regulating emerging technologies like AI, and improving science education. Overall, the discussion centered on how to optimize scientific research and collaboration to solve pressing societal problems.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Fundamental research like PCR testing and 3D printing has proven crucial in addressing urgent societal needs like the COVID-19 pandemic.
While we have some scientific knowledge to tackle issues like climate change and human health, more research is likely needed to fully address these complex challenges.
Continuing basic research and having humility about what the future may require is important.
Open science facilitates global collaboration and is key for solving complex issues that require worldwide cooperation like climate change.
Increasing diversity and inclusion in STEM fields through new programs and opportunities, especially for minority groups, is a priority.
Science diplomacy and international scientific cooperation can play an important role in foreign relations.
Ensuring accessibility of research outcomes and scientific education is important.
Regulating emerging technologies like AI in a sensible way that allows for innovation but protects the public interest remains an open challenge.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Continue robust funding for fundamental scientific research to build our knowledge base and prepare for future challenges, even if applications are not immediately clear.
Prioritize open science practices like open access publishing and open data sharing to accelerate discovery and allow global collaboration on shared problems like climate change.
Broaden participation and diversity in STEM fields through new programs and policies to increase accessibility, provide research opportunities at minority-serving institutions, and engage indigenous communities.
Use science diplomacy and international scientific cooperation to build relationships between nations and jointly address global issues.
Improve science communication and public access to research findings to increase public understanding of science and ensure equitable access to its benefits.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 901

The new challenges of information in parliaments

Organized by: Fonds de recherche du Quebec
Speakers:
Jules Racine St-Jacques
Julie Dirwimmer
Lalita Acharya
Mathieu Ouimet
Stéphane Gagnon
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
In a democratic environment, members of parliament work with information gathered from parliamentary staff, media, lobbies and experts. With the aim of maintaining a strong democracy, parliaments around the world have developed mechanisms to facilitate access to high-quality information for elected representatives, with variations according to continent, language and culture. This panel proposes an overview of these mechanisms including a discussion on emerging issues impacting them, such as the integration of artificial intelligence and the risks of digital interference in democratic processes.

En contexte démocratique, les parlementaires travaillent à partir d’informations collectées via le personnel parlementaire, les médias, les lobbys ou encore les experts. Dans le souci de maintenir une démocratie saine, les parlements à travers le monde ont développé des mécanismes qui facilitent l’accès aux informations de haute qualité pour les élus, avec des variations selon les continents, les langues et les cultures. À l’occasion de ce panel, nous présenterons un aperçu de ces mécanismes, et échangerons sur les enjeux émergents qui les touchent, comme l’intégration de l’intelligence artificielle et les risques d’ingérence numérique dans les processus démocratiques.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists discussed strategies for parliaments to incorporate scientific evidence and expertise into the policymaking process in order to counter disinformation and strengthen democracy. They emphasized the need for nonpartisan parliamentary research services to provide objective analysis to inform complex policy issues. Developing committees and offices dedicated to science and technology assessment was recommended, as well as leveraging networks like the International Parliamentary Union to share best practices. The use of technology like network analysis and AI to detect disinformation patterns was debated, with some arguing for caution to avoid new problems. Overall, the panel advocated fostering a scientific culture in parliaments through mechanisms like peer review, multidisciplinary expertise, open data sharing, and public engagement to bolster evidence-based policymaking.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Disinformation is a major threat to democracy and undermines public trust. More research and tools are needed to detect and counter false information.
There is a need for nonpartisan, evidence-based research and analysis to inform political debate and decision-making. Resources like parliamentary research offices can play this role.
AI chatbots like ChatGPT have potential to generate misinformation and require governance frameworks. But they also provide opportunities to summarize complex issues for legislators.
Multilingual AI models are important for francophone countries but remain limited. More quality training data is needed in French and other languages.
Fact checking and media literacy initiatives are growing but more systematic efforts are required. Social media platforms need to do more to curb misinformation.
Scientists and experts should engage more with policymakers and the public to communicate sound evidence. But their role in politics needs clear boundaries.
More focus is needed on improving civic education and critical thinking skills to inoculate societies against manipulation. Educational reforms are key.
International cooperation on scientific analysis and advice can enhance democratic governance. But it requires overcoming linguistic and cultural barriers.
Formalizing processes for evidence-based policymaking can ensure accountability. But flexibility is also needed for new approaches like AI to assist legislatures.
Overall, disinformation harms democracy. But growing efforts on fact checking, literacy, expert advice and transparency can counter this threat.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Establish a non-partisan parliamentary research service to provide MPs with objective analysis on complex issues. This service should have dedicated research staff with expertise across disciplines.
Create mechanisms for ongoing consultation with outside experts from academia, industry, civil society etc. This allows MPs to access specialized knowledge.
Develop an open access parliamentary library to make research outputs, data, reports etc. publicly available. This promotes transparency and accountability.
Leverage technology like network analysis and natural language processing to help identify mis/disinformation and validate sources. But ensure human oversight.
Formalize protocols for assessing quality and reliability of evidence used in policymaking. This includes criteria like peer review, replicability, conflict of interest disclosure etc.
Foster partnerships between parliaments and scientific institutions. This facilitates knowledge sharing and elevates scientific expertise in policy discussions.
Promote scientific literacy among MPs through training in research methods, data analysis, critical thinking skills etc. This enables better evaluation of technical evidence.
Create cross-party parliamentary committees to address complex science and technology policy issues in a collaborative manner.
Establish international networks for sharing best practices in evidence-based policymaking across different political systems.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 910

Canada’s Quantum potential : critical partnerships and public policy to advance Canada’s leadership in Quantum science and technology.

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 35a - 910 Tuesday, November 14th 10:30am -

Organized by: University of Ottawa
Speakers:
Dr. Khabat Heshami
Dr. Peggy Schmeiser
Dr. Shohini Ghose
Jeff Kinder
Professor Ebrahim Karimi
Professor Ghassan Jabbour
Rafal Janik
Tina Dekker
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Canada’s early commitment to invest in Quantum research and technology has made our nation one of the global leaders in that field, and the $360 million earmarked over a seven-year period to foster the National Quantum Strategy (NQS) is a testament to Canada’s leadership ambition in the future. This panel discussion will address the ever-evolving field of quantum science and technology and offer a unique opportunity to explore its policy dimensions including the current state of the field, its advancements and potential applications, and the overall impact of quantum innovations across various sectors. It will explore the transformative impact of quantum science and technologies, and the quantum revolution 2.0 on society, from diverse expert perspectives, using examples such as the impact of quantum computing on drug discovery or financial modelling, as well as discussing the ethical considerations and potential for misuse in surveillance or disinformation campaigns. This panel will examine a variety of policy and social implications of Quantum technologies, including the impact of foundational research and training, approaches to support Quantum industries at their development stages, risks, obstacles to commercialization, and opportunities for better inclusion.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion begins with concerns raised about the lack of ethics education in physics programs. There is agreement that ethics courses should be mandated to ensure technologies are developed responsibly. A student asks how industry can better engage academia to retain talent. More exposure through internships and exchanges is suggested. An industry representative inquires about the skills needed by technical workers beyond top scientists and engineers, drawing parallels to the semiconductor and telecoms industries. A government official asks how public and private sectors can optimize limited funding and access other sources for collaborative quantum projects addressing climate change. Finally, concerns are raised about diversity and inclusion in physics fields like quantum. There is discussion on how organizations and governments can create a safer, more accessible field to expand the talent pipeline.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a need for more ethics training in physics and quantum programs at universities to ensure technologies are developed responsibly.
Retaining talent in Canada’s quantum industry is a challenge, as students are leaving for opportunities abroad. Industry and academia partnerships could help provide incentives.
Funding models need to evolve to better support quantum startups, as traditional programs don’t always fit their needs. Leveraging private sector funds could help.
Building a strong quantum industry requires supporting both research and commercialization. Funding should enable startups to grow.
Global standards and regulations around quantum technologies need careful implementation to help rather than hinder progress.
Diversity and inclusion remain issues in quantum fields. More work is needed to make these fields accessible and welcoming.
Quantum computing, communications, and sensing raise different ethical concerns based on their varying applications and scopes.
There was agreement on the need for ongoing discussions across sectors to address these challenges facing Canada’s quantum industry.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Require ethics training in physics and quantum programs at universities to ensure technologies are developed responsibly. Work with professional associations to mandate ethics courses.
Engage students in quantum fields through outreach from universities and industry to provide opportunities and prevent brain drain abroad. Develop mentorships and training programs.
Address the global talent shortage through academic retraining programs and visas. Bring in international students and incentivize academics to join industry.
Optimize government funding by supplementing with private sector investments for agriculture and other national priorities. Develop public-private partnerships.
Reform procurement policies to solve real problems and enable economic value. Consult with industry on technical specifications.
Carefully implement standards and tariffs to help rather than hinder industry growth. Conduct impact assessments beforehand.
Provide research funding but also support commercialization and business services for startups to scale up. Fund incubators and accelerators.
Promote diversity and inclusion initiatives to make physics and quantum fields accessible and safe for all. Develop codes of conduct and reporting procedures.
Follow up on access issues depending on quantum application. Balance economic and defense interests transparently.
Continue the ethical debate on computing, communications and sensing given differing applications. Maintain public discourse.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

2023 Conference – Science and Policy

Theme: Science and Policy

Symposiums:

Health Policy Symposium

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Symposium

Indigenous/Northern Challenges Symposium

Breakfast Session:

Conference Panels:

Panel 157

Mechanisms for Effective Science Advice in Public Health and Public Health Emergencies

Organized by: Public Health Agency of Canada Speakers: Bev Holmes Dr. Niklas Bobrovitz Dr. Paul Hébert Dr. Sarah Viehbeck Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 123

Brain Research: The cornerstone for Canada’s future social-economic wealth

Organized by: Canadian Brain Research Strategy Speakers: Cedric Bisson Dr. Allison B. Sekuler, PhD, B.A Dr. Javeria Hashmi, PhD Dr. Michael D. Hill Dr. Rose Goldstein James N. Reynolds Julian Karaguesian Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 105

Law, Public Policy and Social License for Next-Generation Regenerative Medicine Technologies

Speakers: Dr. Amy Zarzeczny Dr. Krishana Sankar Dr. Sowmya Viswanathan Dr. Ubaka Ogbogu Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 116

STEM Moms Project

Organized by: University of Calgary Speakers: Julie Hawco Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 126

Responsible conduct of research through an accessibility and inclusion lens

Organized by: CNIB Panel Date: November 13th, 2023 Speakers: Ainsley Latour Ana Sofia Barrows Andy Livingston Dr. Bonnielin Swenor Dr. Mahadeo Sukhai

Panel 127

Bridging the Gap: Addressing Inequities in STEM for a Sustainable Future

Organized by: SCWIST Panel Date: November 13th, 2023 Speakers: Ainsley Latour Andrea Doucet Commissioner Kadie Ward Dr. Melanie Ratnam Dr. Naheda Sahtout Dr. Poh Tan Harmy Mendoza

Panel 166

Towards accessible and inclusive scientific conferences and meetings for trainees and researchers with disabilities: Priorities for achieving STEM equity

Organized by: University of Montreal Panel Date: November 13th, 2023 Speaker: Dr. Bonnielin Swenor

Panel 103

Developing Research Infrastructure with and for the Canada’s Northern Research Community

Organized by: University of Alberta Speakers: Andrew Applejohn Dr. Bronwyn Hancock Dr. Gwen Healey Akearok Dr. Roseann O’Reilly Runte Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 121

Decolonizing science, technology, and innovation policy – barriers, opportunities and new knowledge systems

Organized by: MITACS Speakers: Brandon Meawasige David Plamondon Dr. Rahina Zarma Genievieve Borg Joseph Torres Ryan Jimmy Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 133

Braiding Indigenous and western knowledge to strengthen scientific research.

Organized by: Maliseet Nation Conservation Council Speakers: Dr. Aruna Jayawardane Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 155

Tools for Braiding Indigenous and Western Knowledges

Organized by: CMN Speakers: Aleesha Tearl Jones Dr. JA Morrow Dr. Paulina Johnson Tiffany Traverse Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Breakfast Session

Hosted by Concordia University

Panel 102

Dual-Use Research of Concern: Research Security for National Security

Organized by: Defence Research and Development Canada Panel Date: November 15th, 2023 Speakers: Amr S. Helmy Dr. Bessma Momani Dr. Dugan O’Neil Dr. Gitanjali Adlakha-Hutcheon Lesley Soper Nick Werstiuk

Panel 111

Transforming the assessment of research excellence

Organized by: NSERC and Concordia University Speakers: Dr. Dominique Bérubé Dr. Giovanna Lima Dr. Karine Duhamel Dr. Shohini Ghose Kori St.Cyr Professor Stephen Curry Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Panel 119

Indigenous Research Ethics: Our understandings and obligations as science and policy practitioners

Organized by: Health Canada Speakers: Dr. Cara Tannenbaum Dr. Emily McAuley Dr. Kyle Bobiwash Dr. Zoe Todd Mr. Justin Sigluk Milton Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Panel 120

The impact of major research facilities as national assets: Responding to the Report of the Advisory Panel on the Federal Research Support System

Organized by: Neutrons Canada Speakers: Dr. Art McDonald Dr. Baljit Singh Dr. Marcella Berg Janet E. Halliwell Kevin Fitzgibbons Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

Panel 128

Aligning federal and provincial/territorial vision and action for a stronger Canadian health research system

Organized by: Health Research BC Speakers: Bev Holmes Carole Jabet Frédéric Bouchard Stefan Leslie Tim Murphy Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Panel 183

Towards the adoption of diverse approaches to open access: Promoting the dissemination and use of knowledge across disciplines

Organized by: Érudit Speakers: Clare Appavoo Gillian Lane-Mercier Marin Dacos Stefanie Haustein Vincent Larivière Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 804

Discussion between Dr. Mona Nemer and Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan

Organized by: Office of the Chief Science Advisor of Canada Speakers: Dr. Alejandro Adem Dr. Mona Nemer Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 901

The new challenges of information in parliaments

Organized by: Fonds de recherche du Quebec Speakers: Jules Racine St-Jacques Julie Dirwimmer Lalita Acharya Mathieu Ouimet Stéphane Gagnon Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 910

Canada’s Quantum potential : critical partnerships and public policy to advance Canada’s leadership in Quantum science and technology.

Organized by: University of Ottawa Speakers: Dr. Khabat Heshami Dr. Peggy Schmeiser Dr. Shohini Ghose Jeff Kinder Professor Ebrahim Karimi Professor Ghassan Jabbour Rafal Janik Tina Dekker Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Organized by: Public Health Agency of Canada
Speakers:
Bev Holmes
Dr. Niklas Bobrovitz
Dr. Paul Hébert
Dr. Sarah Viehbeck
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: Canadian Brain Research Strategy
Speakers:
Cedric Bisson
Dr. Allison B. Sekuler, PhD, B.A
Dr. Javeria Hashmi, PhD
Dr. Michael D. Hill
Dr. Rose Goldstein
James N. Reynolds
Julian Karaguesian
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Speakers:
Dr. Amy Zarzeczny
Dr. Krishana Sankar
Dr. Sowmya Viswanathan
Dr. Ubaka Ogbogu
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: University of Calgary
Speakers:
Julie Hawco
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: CNIB
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speakers:
Ainsley Latour
Ana Sofia Barrows
Andy Livingston
Dr. Bonnielin Swenor
Dr. Mahadeo Sukhai

Organized by: SCWIST
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speakers:
Ainsley Latour
Andrea Doucet
Commissioner Kadie Ward
Dr. Melanie Ratnam
Dr. Naheda Sahtout
Dr. Poh Tan
Harmy Mendoza

Organized by: University of Montreal
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speaker:
Dr. Bonnielin Swenor

Organized by: University of Alberta
Speakers:
Andrew Applejohn
Dr. Bronwyn Hancock
Dr. Gwen Healey Akearok
Dr. Roseann O’Reilly Runte
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: MITACS
Speakers:
Brandon Meawasige
David Plamondon
Dr. Rahina Zarma
Genievieve Borg
Joseph Torres
Ryan Jimmy
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: Maliseet Nation Conservation Council
Speakers:
Dr. Aruna Jayawardane
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: CMN
Speakers:
Aleesha Tearl Jones
Dr. JA Morrow
Dr. Paulina Johnson
Tiffany Traverse
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: Defence Research and Development Canada
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023
Speakers:
Amr S. Helmy
Dr. Bessma Momani
Dr. Dugan O’Neil
Dr. Gitanjali Adlakha-Hutcheon
Lesley Soper
Nick Werstiuk

Organized by: NSERC and Concordia University
Speakers:
Dr. Dominique Bérubé
Dr. Giovanna Lima
Dr. Karine Duhamel
Dr. Shohini Ghose
Kori St.Cyr
Professor Stephen Curry
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Organized by: Health Canada
Speakers:
Dr. Cara Tannenbaum
Dr. Emily McAuley
Dr. Kyle Bobiwash
Dr. Zoe Todd
Mr. Justin Sigluk Milton
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Organized by: Neutrons Canada
Speakers:
Dr. Art McDonald
Dr. Baljit Singh
Dr. Marcella Berg
Janet E. Halliwell
Kevin Fitzgibbons
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

Organized by: Health Research BC
Speakers:
Bev Holmes
Carole Jabet
Frédéric Bouchard
Stefan Leslie
Tim Murphy
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Organized by: Érudit
Speakers:
Clare Appavoo
Gillian Lane-Mercier
Marin Dacos
Stefanie Haustein
Vincent Larivière
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: Office of the Chief Science Advisor of Canada
Speakers:
Dr. Alejandro Adem
Dr. Mona Nemer
Dr. Sethuraman Panchanathan
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: Fonds de recherche du Quebec
Speakers:
Jules Racine St-Jacques
Julie Dirwimmer
Lalita Acharya
Mathieu Ouimet
Stéphane Gagnon
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: University of Ottawa
Speakers:
Dr. Khabat Heshami
Dr. Peggy Schmeiser
Dr. Shohini Ghose
Jeff Kinder
Professor Ebrahim Karimi
Professor Ghassan Jabbour
Rafal Janik
Tina Dekker
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023