2023 Conference – Science and Society

Panel Abstract:
We live in a world where information is abundant and readily available, which has resulted in information fatigue. While people are better informed than ever before, they are also more skeptical. Rather than being fearful, people are frustrated—and they are looking for new ways to navigate the sea of information they encounter every day. This panel will explore insights from key studies released in 2023 and address how people perceive and react to misinformation and disinformation, and how this affects their views on information and science. The panel will shed light on challenges and opportunities that exist for organizations needing to communicate important facts about topics that matter.

Context:
The panel discussion centers around the critical issue of misinformation, particularly in the context of science and health. It specifically focuses on the impact of misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic, underlining its effects on public health, vaccine hesitancy, and the associated economic and social consequences. The conversation extends to the psychological underpinnings of why people are drawn to and share misinformation. This subject is particularly relevant in the digital era, where social media platforms play a pivotal role in the dissemination of information, both accurate and misleading.

Key Takeaways:

Impact of Misinformation on Public Health: The research presented in the panel demonstrates a direct correlation between misinformation and public health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. It quantifies the significant increase in COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths attributable to vaccine hesitancy fueled by misinformation. Additionally, it highlights the substantial financial burden on healthcare systems due to misinformation-induced health crises.
Behavioral Insights into Misinformation Sharing: The panel sheds light on an intriguing aspect of human behavior in the digital age – while people can generally distinguish between true and false information, their willingness to share content is less influenced by its accuracy. Instead, factors like emotional engagement, social signaling, and the element of surprise play a more significant role. This tendency creates a discrepancy between belief accuracy and sharing intentions, facilitating the spread of misinformation.
Role of Digital Platforms: The discussion acknowledges the significant role that digital platforms play in the spread of misinformation. These platforms often amplify sensational or emotionally charged content, regardless of its truthfulness, thereby shaping public discourse and perception in potentially harmful ways.

Recommendations:

Behavioral Science Interventions: The panel advocates for the development and implementation of behavioral science interventions to mitigate the spread of misinformation. These interventions could include strategies that encourage individuals to reflect on the accuracy of information before sharing and promote critical thinking skills.
Collaborative Efforts Across Sectors: Addressing the challenge of misinformation requires a multi-faceted approach involving government, academia, media, and technology companies. Collaborative efforts are essential to develop and implement comprehensive strategies that effectively combat misinformation while preserving individual freedoms and promoting factual discourse.
Educational Initiatives: There is a call for enhanced educational initiatives to improve digital literacy and critical thinking skills among the public. By equipping individuals with the tools to critically evaluate information, society can become more resilient against the tide of misinformation.
In essence, the panel underscores the necessity for evidence-based solutions and multi-sector collaboration to counteract the pervasive issue of misinformation, especially in critical domains like public health.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 705

Fundamentals in Science Communication and Education

Organized by: Perimiter Institute
Panel Date: November 3rd, 2023
Speakers:
Dr. Damian Pope
Dr. Emily Petroff
Mark Healy

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
We live and work in a dynamic era. Societal and institutional norms are shifting. Inevitably, this has impacted science communication and education, in terms of both message and medium. In many respects, science has never been more front-and-centre in the media in in public interest. On the other hand, differing views and voices create noise and confusion. In this virtual session, the interrelating roles of communication and education as fundamental underpinnings of science in society are examined, with a deep dive on contemporary classroom methods & communication platforms.

Context:
This panel, organized by the Perimeter Institute, commenced with a focus on science communication and education, delving into topics such as critical thinking, quantum physics, and artificial intelligence (AI). The panelists discussed the significance of science communication in society and the educational system. The discussions covered how science communication and science literacy are embedded in higher education institutions in Canada and the role of critical thinking as a foundational societal skill.

Key Takeaways:

Science Communication and Critical Thinking: The panel emphasized the importance of science communication in various societal aspects, including policy-making and education. It was highlighted that critical thinking is not just a science skill but a societal skill that can benefit various fields. The panel discussed how scientific methods can teach critical thinking through problem-solving approaches.
Quantum Physics and AI: The conversation shifted to quantum physics and AI, exploring their fundamental principles and potential societal impacts. The panelists talked about the transformation quantum technologies, like quantum computers, can bring, especially in solving complex problems in areas like climate change and healthcare.
Science in Higher Education: The panel addressed how science communication and literacy are becoming integral parts of higher education, noting that universities are increasingly focusing on teaching students how to communicate scientific results and engage with the media effectively.
Emphasis was placed on preparing students for diverse career paths using their science education.
Navigating Polarized Landscapes: Addressing the challenges of communicating science in a polarized social media landscape, the panelists suggested understanding the audience’s perspective and background as a starting point for effective communication.

Recommendations:

Integrating Science Communication in Education: The panel recommended embedding science communication and critical thinking more deeply into educational curricula, from high schools to universities. This integration could better prepare students for the workforce and societal challenges.
Fostering Collaborations and Public Engagement: Encouraging collaborations between scientists, educators, policymakers, and the public was seen as crucial in promoting science literacy and informed decision-making in society.
Adapting to Technological Advances: The panel advised staying informed and adaptable to the rapid advancements in fields like quantum physics and
AI, emphasizing the importance of ongoing education and public discourse in these areas.
Engaging with Diverse Audiences: To effectively navigate polarized environments, especially on social media, the panelists recommended engaging with diverse audiences in a respectful and understanding manner, tailoring communication strategies to meet different perspectives and concerns.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 714

Impact of Science and Innovation on Society

Organized by: University of Manitoba
Speakers:
Dr. Dorthe Dahl-Jensen
Dr. Hans-Joachim Wieden
Sarah Laframboise
Tarik Moroy
Panel Date: November 2nd, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
The panel will discuss the breadth of impacts that science has on society deriving from the confluence of the different aspects of the science and research enterprise. The discussion will highlight the interconnectivity of these aspects and how science can provide innovative solutions for societal challenges, as well as to inform public decision making and contribute to societal resilience in an ever changing technology and geopolitical context.

Content:
This panel centered on the intricate relationship between scientific research, innovation, and their societal impacts. It explored the challenges and opportunities within the science-policy interface, emphasizing the importance of trust-building between researchers and communities, and the role of funding in fostering robust research and innovation. The dialogue also touched on the essential contribution of graduate students and postdocs in the scientific ecosystem, underscoring their need for diverse skills and support. A significant portion of the discussion focused on the challenges of translating academic research into practical societal benefits, and the comparative analysis of funding models in other countries to understand how Canada can enhance its competitive edge in global research and innovation.

Key Takeaways:

Importance of Trust and Engagement: The critical role of building trust between researchers and communities was highlighted. This involves researchers being seen as human beings first and engaging with communities to understand their needs and perspectives.
Challenges in Translating Science to Society: Difficulties in translating scientific findings into practical applications were discussed. These include the gap between academic discoveries and their implementation in society and the complexities involved in the innovation process.
Role of Graduate Students in Science and Innovation: The panel emphasized the significance of graduate students and postdocs in carrying out research and their role as the foundation of the scientific ecosystem. Discussions also focused on the need for their diverse skill sets and training to adapt to current and future demands.
Funding and Resource Allocation: The need for appropriate funding in the scientific community, particularly for basic research, was underlined. Comparison with funding models and levels in other countries was made to underscore the necessity for Canada to be competitive in global research and innovation.

Recommendations:

Enhancing Research Funding: Encourage increased funding for basic research and graduate student programs, ensuring the financial stability and competitiveness of the Canadian scientific ecosystem.
Fostering Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Promote more interdisciplinary research and partnerships between academia, industry, and policy makers to align better with societal needs.
Supporting Innovation and Risk-taking: Advocate for creating environments that allow scientists to take calculated risks, leading to higher levels of innovation and discovery.
Building Community Trust: Focus on developing meaningful relationships with communities and stakeholders, ensuring the relevance and acceptance of scientific research within society.
Educational and Public Engagement: Emphasize the importance of education and public engagement in science, improving the general public’s understanding and acceptance of scientific advancements.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 222

Black Inclusion in STEM: Strengthening Education and Employment Pathways for Black Students, Graduates, and Professionals

Organized by: Visions of Science
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speakers:
Angelo Nwigwe
Desiree F. Sylvestre
Dr. Jennifer D. Adams
Dr. Maydianne Andrade
Dr. Toyib Olaniyan
Lisa Cole

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
In STEM and beyond, aggregate ‘visible minorities’ statistics have frequently obscured the unique and severe consequences of anti-Black racism. Canada is over-reliant on immigration to fill the annual Black STEM-qualified labour supply, revealing a troubling domestic workforce development gap. Canada is profoundly failing to support the education, employment, and career progression of Canadian-born Black students, graduates, and professionals in STEM. This session will discuss the strategies and collaborations required to 1) support dignity, quality, and belonging for Black students, 2) strengthen Black talent development and equitable access to STEM careers, and 3) ensure Black professionals are empowered to thrive within the sector.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists discussed strategies and programs aimed at increasing representation and inclusion of Black professionals in STEM fields. They highlighted the importance of community-centered, culturally responsive programs that engage Black youth and foster STEM identity development. Several panelists outlined out-of-school programs providing paid internships, skills training, and networking for Black students and professionals. The discussion emphasized moving beyond data collection to taking action by visiting community programs, advocating for sustainable funding, and addressing systemic barriers. A recurrent theme was the need to transition from talk to tangible efforts to implement inclusive programs and policies. The panelists aimed to share knowledge and strategies to increase STEM diversity through community engagement, professional development pipelines, and systemic change.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Community-centered STEM programs for black youth that foster identity and achievement are having success through both short-term and long-term engagement.
Inclusive program design and paid internships are helping provide equitable STEM opportunities for black students.
Leveraging student interests and recognizing their potential contributions is an effective approach.
Targeted recruitment programs can successfully match black candidates with jobs by identifying and addressing skills gaps.
Professional networks and work experience build confidence and support successful transitions for black STEM professionals.
There is a need to move beyond just collecting data to implementing culturally responsive programming with sustainable funding.
Visiting successful community programs helps demonstrate their impact and inspire action.
The time is now to transition from discussion to concrete steps that address systemic barriers to inclusion.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Create more community-centered STEM programs like Visions of Science that provide culturally responsive programming and foster STEM identity and achievement for black youth through both short-term and long-term engagement.
Expand inclusive internship programs like K to I Academy’s that provide paid STEM experiences for black high school students to build skills and confidence.
Develop out-of-school programs that leverage student interests and allow them to contribute meaningfully while gaining STEM exposure.
Implement recruitment pilot programs that identify skills gaps, provide training if needed, and match candidates to jobs, with a focus on mentorship and retention.
Secure sustainable funding streams from government, companies, and donors to support impactful programs and address systemic barriers.
Move from discussion to action by visiting successful community programs, identifying their effective components, and implementing similar initiatives.
Build networks and communities of support for black STEM professionals and students to aid transitions and foster belonging.
Collect diversity data but focus more on program outcomes and impact in building STEM identity and opportunity.
Engage more stakeholders from community organizations, education, government, and companies to work collaboratively.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 908

Brain Health Matters: Reducing Stigma and Harnessing the Power of Knowing

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - S4a - 908 - Symposium Health Policy PARTNE

Organized by: ROCHE
Speakers:
Dr. Alonso Montoya
Dr. Gustavo Saposnik
Khushbu Patel
Kyle Fitzgerald
Laura Tamblyn Watts
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
As of today, there are over half a million Canadians living with dementia – plus about 25,000 new cases diagnosed every year. By 2031, that number is expected to rise to 937,000. Public attitudes towards people affected by dementia have become of increasingly important to reduce stigma, encourage lifestyles changes and seek an earlier diagnosis. The role of the public also is an important factor for those caring for loved ones with dementia. Education, awareness and research are some areas that can contribute to changing the way dementia is viewed and treated in our communities. This panel will offer insights and spark ideas on how dementia related stigma and percpetions are being changed in various parts of the patient journey to highlight the importance of knowing… early…

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists at the brain health symposium covered several important topics related to dementia, including prevalence, care challenges, new treatments, public perceptions, and balancing optimism with realism. Statistics on the growing number of Canadians living with dementia were outlined, underscoring the need for policy changes and prevention. Challenges measuring success of the national dementia strategy were noted. A study on decision making for dementia care in primary settings revealed uncertainties. Research on patient/caregiver experiences with Alzheimer’s biomarker testing provided insights. A study on employee knowledge of dementia highlighted public misconceptions. The potential for new treatments sparked optimism, but the panelists emphasized managing expectations given the continuing need to improve care and reduce stigma. Overall, the discussions conveyed cautious hope, stressing the importance of precision when communicating about emerging dementia treatments while addressing the realities of stigma and care deficits.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Dementia rates in Canada are high and projected to increase significantly, from almost 600,000 currently to over 1.7 million by 2050. Bold policy changes and prevention strategies are needed.
Measuring the success of Canada’s national dementia strategy remains a challenge. Clear metrics are needed.
Primary care providers face uncertainty in dementia management. More evidence-based guidelines could improve decision making.
Patients and caregivers have varied experiences with Alzheimer’s disease biomarker testing. Managing expectations is important.
Employees have limited knowledge of dementia. Raising awareness can reduce stigma but expectations must be carefully managed.
Balancing hope and realism is critical in dementia awareness efforts. New treatments provide hope but challenges remain.
Stigma persists and must continue to be addressed.
While hope is warranted, precision is needed when communicating about potential new treatments to avoid overpromising.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Increase funding for dementia research to develop new treatments and identify effective prevention strategies. Canada should aim to be a global leader in dementia research.
Expand education and training programs for family doctors on dementia screening, diagnosis, treatment and management. Equip them to have informed discussions with patients.
Create more robust public awareness campaigns to reduce stigma around dementia and educate on risk factors and prevention. Tailor messaging to avoid fear-mongering.
Develop clear standards and metrics to measure progress and success of Canada’s National Dementia Strategy. Track key indicators over time.
Provide more financial support and respite care services to dementia caregivers. Caregiver burnout is a major issue.
Increase access to counseling services for those receiving an early diagnosis. Proper emotional support is critical.
Encourage advance care planning conversations between patients, caregivers and doctors early on. Clarify wishes when patients still have capacity.
Promote clinical trials and reduce barriers to enrollment. Diversify clinical trial populations. New treatments rely on trial participation.
Integrate palliative care earlier on for quality of life. Avoid over-medicalization at end of life.
Sponsor more multidisciplinary conferences to share learnings across research, clinical care, policy making and health advocacy.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 219

Advancing inclusive science as pathway to innovative and sustainability transformations: Emerging Insights from institutional and organizational approaches

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 57a - 219 - Wednesday, November 15th 1:15p

Organized by: NRCan
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023
Speakers:
Dr. David Nanang
Dr. Doreen Churchill
Dr. Effah Kwabena Antwi
Dr. John Boakye-Danquah
Dr. Steffany Bennett
Elder Verna McGregor
Trudy Samuel

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Throughout history, science has evolved to address many of the problems that the world has faced. However, science itself has come under increased scrutiny evidenced by the spread of misinformation, disconnection between the public and scientists, decrease in public trust in science, and the lack of representativeness, inclusivity, and diversity in science. We aim to highlight promising approaches, lessons, and gaps in knowledge on actions that advance EDI in scientific enterprise to provide opportunities for knowledge exchange. Panelists will discuss initiatives, cases and success stories from Canada, United States, Europe and from the global south on how to advance inclusive science initiatives and practices.

Summary of Conversations:
A panel discussion was held on advancing inclusive science. Panelists discussed what inclusive science means to them and barriers they’ve faced. Issues like representation, culture, biases, and accessibility were raised. Potential solutions like tools, training, and integrating equity into performance management were suggested. There was reflection on progress made but more work needed for full inclusivity. The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council now requires addressing equity, diversity and inclusion in proposals. Academic performance rose for minority scholarship recipients. Engaging diverse youth was emphasized. A mentorship program between indigenous and western science was discussed. An audience member asked how policies can ensure real cultural change, not just box checking. There was a disagreement about sunscreen. Positive experience with a renewable energy program was shared.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Funding policies now require proposals to address equity, diversity and inclusion. These factors are considered when evaluating proposals.
Initiatives aimed at increasing scholarships for underrepresented groups have successfully raised academic performance of recipients.
Engaging youth, especially those from diverse backgrounds, is crucial to building an inclusive scientific community. Mentorship programs can facilitate this.
Incorporating inclusion in fields like geology that do not directly study people can be challenging. Creative solutions are needed.
True cultural change requires more than just checking boxes on funding requirements. Policies must enable real change.
There can be disagreements on inclusive policies even within marginalized communities. Continued dialogue is important.
Inclusive programs for renewable energy have provided positive experiences for some marginalized groups. This is a model to build on.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Implement mandatory equity, diversity and inclusion training for all employees, with a focus on addressing unconscious biases. This will help foster an inclusive work culture.
Expand existing mentorship initiatives like Sistering Indigenous and Western Science to additional underrepresented groups. Mentorship helps create role models and support networks.
Conduct ongoing reviews of policies, programs and funding through an inclusion lens. This ensures initiatives translate into meaningful change rather than box-checking.
Increase scholarships and academic support targeting underrepresented students in STEM. Financial aid and community can improve recruitment and retention.
Create opportunities for intergenerational collaboration, such as youth outreach events. Engaging students early on sparks interest and sets the foundation.
Develop inclusive best practices for geological and environmental research. Consulting impacted communities enables maximizing relevance.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 226

Nouvelle loi, nouveau plan d’action pour les langues officielles : quelles avancées pour la recherche en français?

Organized by: Conseil d’administration de la Fédération des sciences humaines
Speakers:
Anne-José Villeneuve
Annie Pilote
Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault
Sylvie A. Lamoureux O.Ont., Ph.D.
Tanja Niemann
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
La version modernisée de la Loi sur les langues officielles et le nouveau Plan d’action pour les langues officielles s’inscrivent dans un contexte d’urgence vis-à-vis du soutien à la recherche en français au Canada. Partout au Canada, et notamment dans les contextes linguistiques minoritaires, les chercheur.euse.s francophones sont confronté.e.s à des défis en matière de financement, de production et de diffusion de leurs travaux de recherche en français. Ce panel, co-organisé par l’Acfas et la Fédération des sciences humaines, discutera des solutions politiques pour relever ces défis, et construire un écosystème de recherche plus fort, reflétant la diversité linguistique du Canada.

Summary of Conversations:
The panelists stressed the importance of supporting and promoting research in French in Canada to maintain the vitality of both official languages and strengthen the research ecosystem. They called for increased collaboration and funding for French research and training. Recommendations were made to develop concrete programs and initiatives to finance, diffuse and value French academic work and scholars. The need to have a coordinated national strategy and vision for French research was emphasized, including ways to increase its impact. The panelists highlighted the benefits of French research for Canada’s competitiveness and international presence. There was discussion about engaging with partners and stakeholders to advance policies and practices that enable French research and knowledge development. Overall, the panel advocated for concrete actions and investments to sustain French research and scholarship in Canada.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a need for more concrete action and funding to support French language research in Canada to ensure the vitality of both official languages.
Strategic investments in French research capacity across disciplines at universities can strengthen the research ecosystem.
Better coordination between federal, provincial, and territorial governments is required to advance the national French language research agenda.
More can be done to increase the international visibility and impact of Canadian French language research through open access publishing platforms.
Diplomacy efforts are needed to amplify the voice of Francophone researchers on the world stage.
Improved long-term planning and strategic vision is necessary to sustain support for French research in Canada.
Greater engagement with Francophone communities across Canada is important to build public appreciation for French research.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Increase funding and support for French language research to strengthen Canada’s bilingual research ecosystem. This includes targeted investments, partnerships, and promotion of French publications.
Develop concrete strategies and long-term visions to advance the vitality of French in Canada’s minority contexts, including collaboration with stakeholders.
Leverage diplomacy and international partnerships to expand the reach of Canadian French research and support Francophone communities globally.
Improve coordination and alignment between different levels of government, institutions, and stakeholders on French language policies and initiatives.
Promote the visibility and impact of French research through communication campaigns, events, media engagement and other outreach.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 243

Evidence and Innovation Support in the Social Sector

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 38a - 243 - Tuesday, November 14th 1:30pm

Organized by: La Collaborative
Speakers:
Dr. Elicia Maine
John Hepburn
Marie-Claude Lagacé
Michael Wilson
Sandra Lapointe
Ursula Gobel
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
The panel builds on emerging alignment and concertation efforts around the Canadian Forum for Social Innovation (socialinnovationforum.ca) to inform discussion on strategy and policy from the perspectives of institutional enablers in the social innovation ecosystem. Specifically, the panel will consider two main elements of a support system for systems innovation around the great societal challenges: talent and usability of/access to research knowledge in practical and decision-making context.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion focused on social innovation and the role of evidence to support and enable it. Topics included defining social innovation and distinguishing it from industry innovation, the complexity of addressing societal issues, the need to involve social sciences and humanities from the start, and integrating knowledge across sectors. Funding challenges for social innovation projects were raised, as well as the importance of considering well-being and social goals. Approaches to disseminating and scaling social innovations, including mass adoption versus iterative replication models, were discussed. The role of different actors like universities in enabling social innovation was highlighted. Building receptive cultures and receptor capacity for innovations was emphasized. The use of co-design with citizens and rapid learning cycles was advocated. Strengthening domestic and global evidence systems to support evidence use was recommended. Overall, the discussion centered on defining social innovation, exploring how to enable it through evidence and collaboration across disciplines and sectors, and considering approaches to scaling impact.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a need to better integrate evidence and research into social innovation efforts through rapid learning and co-design with citizens.
The current system does not always enable social sector actors and communities to create change as easily as other sectors.
Categorizing innovation too narrowly into social vs commercial can miss opportunities for collaboration and impact. Most research can have social benefits.
Networks are finding ways to harness science and evidence to help marginalized groups, but scaling and implementation remains a challenge.
Funding and support is needed to build capacity in the social sector to absorb and implement innovations.
Examples exist of universities and research centers driving social change through community partnerships.
There is power in reframing discussions around enabling social sector actors as agents of change rather than passive recipients.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Fund and support social innovation projects and organizations by changing funding criteria to be more inclusive of social sector actors and approaches.
Provide equitable access to resources.
Build partnerships and collaboration between social innovators, communities, universities, companies and government to leverage diverse knowledge and capabilities. Use co-design methods.
Integrate social sciences and humanities expertise into innovation projects early on. Change cultures that undervalue these disciplines.
Focus innovation on creating social value and improving wellbeing in addition to economic value. Blur boundaries between social and industrial innovation.
Employ equity-based co-design processes that center communities and citizens experiencing issues to develop social innovations.
Utilize rapid learning and user-driven improvement cycles to quickly iterate social innovations based on real-world feedback.
Develop mechanisms and capacity for scaling positive social innovations across communities and systems.
Leverage existing networks and programs like the NSIRC Alliance Option 2 to enable social innovation.
Reframe discussions around supporting actors creating change out of necessity rather than overly categorizing types of innovation.
Harness science and evidence to drive social innovation but stay grounded in lived experience.
Invest in developing social innovation receptor capacity and ecosystems.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 270

Partnering with the public for the co-production of knowledge: How the federal government can increase its use of citizen science to tackle grand challenges

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 52a - 270 - Wednesday, November 15th 10:30

Organized by: Health Canada and Laboratories Canada (Public Services and Procurement Canada)
Speakers:
Achla Joshi
Dr. Beth Armstrong
Dr. Shawn Marshall
Erin O’Sullivan
Jason Hwang
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
As Canadians seek to meaningfully engage with science, and amid recent calls for action on Citizen Science at the Standing Committee on Science and Research, the Federal government has an opportunity to partner with the public to leverage diverse knowledge and underutilized expertise, increase Canada’s capacity to tackle grand challenges, and strengthen the science-society relationship. Citizen science is already embedded within international research enterprises and supported by legislation, formal standards, and digital infrastructure. Drawing on diverse experiences, panelists will discuss opportunities to strengthen Canadian citizen science building on experience advancing projects, international successes, and culturally-safe principles for digital enablement.

Panel 277

Science for Social Justice: Advancing the agenda set by the 2022 Cape Town World Science Forum

English
French

Organized by: South African Department of Science and Innovation
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023
Speakers:
Azeeza Rangunwala
Dr. Saja Al Zoubi (She/her)
Julia MacKenzie
Ms. Mmampei Chaba
Professor Rémi Quirion

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
South Africa had hosted the 10th World Science Forum (WSF), a platform for global science policy dialogue, in Cape Town in December 2022. The WSF is co-organised by a partnership involving global science organisations including UNESCO, the AAAS and the International Science Council, and Hungarian Academy of Science. The theme of the 2022 WSF was “”Science for Social Justice.”” During a week of intense debate more than 3000 participants from across the world debated the role of science in advancing social justice. This session will review the outcomes of the Forum, including the WSF Declaration on Science for Social Justice.

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussed science for social justice and the Cape Town Declaration from the 2022 World Science Forum. Topics included equity, diversity, inclusion, and the role of scientists in society. The work of an initiative supporting scholars fleeing conflict zones was presented. South Africa’s social challenges and the five themes of the Cape Town Declaration were explained. The need for interdisciplinary collaboration and inclusion of indigenous knowledge systems was emphasized. Open science and access for all was discussed. Africa’s small emissions but South Africa’s large contribution was mentioned. Implementing policies despite scientific evidence of climate change was examined. Health emerging as an issue at COP meetings was raised. False solutions to climate change and the role of scientists in evaluating them was deliberated. Human rights violations related to raw materials were highlighted. Mental health impacts of the climate crisis on youth were explored. The role of scientists in advocating for evidence-based change through partnerships between civil society and science was discussed. Public engagement in research was proposed.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

The Cape Town Declaration from the World Science Forum calls for science to advance social justice and have a voice in climate investment discussions.
However, implementation remains a challenge.
Citizen science initiatives like bucket monitoring systems in South Africa demonstrate how communities can collect evidence of environmental injustice, though more work is needed.
Open science and real-world impact beyond publications is important, but disconnects remain between scientific evidence and policy action.
Intersectionality must be addressed in climate justice definitions to ensure justice for all. Health is emerging as a key intersection.
COP28 having an official health day is a milestone, but holistic partnerships between disciplines and sectors are still developing.
The voice of science must be amplified over political and economic interests, requiring work on power dynamics.
Meaningful community engagement, not just tokenism, is vital but difficult to truly achieve.
Despite strong evidence, urgency, and declarations, major implementation challenges persist in translating words into action.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Scientists must build partnerships with civil society organizations and communities to ensure research informs policy and leads to action. Work across disciplines and with policymakers.
Implement the recommendations from the Cape Town Declaration to advance science for social justice. Support at-risk scholars from conflict zones.
Make scientific knowledge open and accessible beyond academic publications to empower communities. Support citizen science initiatives.
Translate evidence into policy and real-world impact. Confront barriers to implementation. Hold leaders accountable.
Address Africa’s needs, as the most vulnerable continent to climate change despite minimal emissions. Ensure climate financing discussions consider Africa.
Tackle false solutions that prioritize profits over people and planet. Reform political economies and power dynamics preventing progress.
Leverage multilateral forums like COP meetings to advance climate justice. Use science diplomacy. Have health officials involved.
Amplify voices of youth and frontline communities demanding bolder action. Keep justice central to climate action.
Work across disciplines to develop holistic solutions. Incorporate indigenous knowledge and local perspectives.
Prepare health systems to handle complex impacts of climate change. Strengthen pandemic preparedness.
Enhance vaccine equity and confront power imbalances enabling inequitable access globally.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 289

A Question of Trust

ENG CSPC2023 Panels - 43a - 289 Tuesday, November 14th 3:30pm -

Organized by: Council of Canadian Academies
Speakers:
Anita Melnyk
Caitlin Fowler
Jennifer Stoddart
Marianne Mader
Wendy Hui Kyong Chun
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Trust is an indispensable but fragile contributor to a healthy society. The decline of public trust in institutions, experts, and science is an existential threat to individual and collective well-being in Canada. Its effects are already being felt in the science policy ecosystem, as declines in trust at all levels combine to produce a complicated and difficult context in which to develop effective public policy. To what extent can transparent evidence-informed policy-making impact public trust, and how?

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion focused on rebuilding public trust in science and scientists. The panelists acknowledged declining trust due to issues like lack of transparency, information overload, and misconduct undermining credibility. They discussed the importance of effective communication to diverse audiences by meeting people where they are, using engaging approaches, and recognizing different sources of information. The panelists emphasized transparency, consensus-building, acknowledging mistakes, and critical self-reflection as ways to improve trustworthiness. They noted that marginalized groups and early career researchers may distrust media engagement. Restoring trust requires understanding problems facing vulnerable communities. The panelists concluded that overcoming obstacles like tribalism requires recognizing people’s varying interests and information sources when communicating science. Rebuilding trust hinges on transparency, engagement tailored to different audiences, and scientific institutions addressing credibility issues.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

There is a lack of public trust in science communication and early career researchers as well as marginalized groups fear engaging with media. More transparency is needed to rebuild this trust.
Government decisions often lack transparency about the evidence used in decision making. Canadians value transparency in the decision making process.
Addressing misconduct in science is important to rebuild public trust when scientists undermine it themselves. Institutions must understand problems facing vulnerable groups as well.
Fun, engaging science communication activities can help discuss sensitive topics and meet people where they are, like with vaccines.
Incorporating lessons from science communication research on effectively engaging different audiences is important.
Recognizing people access information from many sources and meeting them at their interest level is key, rather than expecting they will come to you.
Effort is required to overcome obstacles to trust like tribalism.
Different audiences require tailored communication strategies to rebuild trust, not one-size-fits-all approaches.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Conduct further research to understand declining trust in institutions and how to rebuild it. Surveys show falling public trust; it’s important to dig deeper into the causes and solutions.
Improve transparency around decision-making processes and the evidence used to inform policies. Citizens value clarity on how conclusions are reached.
Tailor communication and outreach to specific audiences. Different groups have varying needs and interests when engaging with science.
Involve early career researchers and marginalized communities more actively. These groups often feel excluded and mistrustful; soliciting their input builds trust.
Present scientific information clearly and accessibly. Use plain language, analogies, visuals etc. to convey complex topics simply to non-expert audiences.
Meet people’s interests where they are. Discuss sensitive issues like vaccines through fun, engaging activities that draw people in.
Learn from science communication research on effective engagement tactics. Incorporate evidence-based best practices.
Recognize people get information from diverse sources. Provide science communication through the channels they actually use.
Address scientific misconduct transparently. Institutions must acknowledge and resolve internal breaches of trust.
Foster dialogues between scientists and citizens. Build relationships through two-way conversations, not one-way messaging.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

Panel 801

Science in times of conflict: how to support and limit impact?

English
French

Organized by: Fonds de recherche du Quebec
Speakers:
Carole Jabet
Encieh Erfani
Jean Lebel
Mirja Trilsch
S. Karly Kehoe
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

See Panel Details

Panel Abstract:
Recent increase in internal and international conflicts is impacting science and scientists. Whole some members of the research community have the possibility to continue their work, others are more however are more directly impacted. Is exile the solution? What are the short- and long-term impacts of this exodus on States, research, scientists and their families? Will the departure of researchers have an impact on the reconstruction capacity in their places of origin once the conflict is over? How should support for scientists in difficulty be structured, so that their personal and professional interests are taken into account?

La multiplication récente des conflits internes et internationaux impacte les sciences et les scientifiques. Alors que certains membres de la communauté de recherche ayant fui leur pays peuvent poursuivre leurs travaux, d’autres sont plus directement affectés. Est-ce que la fuite est la solution ? Quel est l’impact à court et long terme de cet exode pour les États, les recherches, les scientifiques et leurs familles ? Est-ce que le départ des chercheuses et chercheurs aura un impact sur la capacité de reconstruction de leur lieu d’origine, une fois le conflit terminé ? Comment devrait être encadré le soutien aux scientifiques en difficulté afin que leurs intérêts personnels et professionnels soient pris en compte ?

Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion centered around supporting researchers impacted by conflict and repression through exile and displacement. Speakers shared experiences establishing programs to assist international scholars forced to flee volatile situations, emphasizing the need to treat displaced academics with dignity as assets rather than charity cases. Challenges were raised regarding proving eligibility, defining conflicts, timeframes for assistance, integration and long-term placements. Speakers stressed the importance of clear communication, equal treatment regardless of country of origin, and advocating for dedicated immigration policies. Overall the discussion highlighted the neutrality of science and the moral imperative to help threatened researchers continue their work in safety through collaborative efforts between institutions, governments and NGOs. Concepts of exile, displacement, dignity, charity, immigration policy, and scientific neutrality framed the conversation.

Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:

Challenging experience as an exiled Iranian scientist in Germany, including difficulties proving her situation to aid organizations was shared.
Establishment of a Science in Exile program and support group for displaced scholars like those impacted by the Ukraine war was discussed. Clear communication about program terms is important.
The ways researchers can become targets of repression, and their human rights violated so called Scholars at Risk were highlighted.
Royal Society of Edinburgh established an organization to assist displaced academics.
The panel addressed questions about supporting exiled scholars and maintaining collaborations. NCA stressed defining “”conflict”” and treating all groups equally.
Audience questions focused on benefits of hosting displaced scholars and integration challenges. Panel emphasized dignity, inclusion and viewing scholars as assets.
Panelists stressed the importance of neutrality in science, equal treatment of scholars, pursuing longer-term placements, and advocating for policies to better support displaced researchers.
Overall, the discussion highlighted the challenges faced by conflict-displaced scholars and the need for dedicated programs and policies to assist them.

Recommendations (or Next Steps):

Define conflicts more broadly to include threats to academic freedom and human rights abuses when determining eligibility for scientist in exile programs.
Provide equitable support for scientists from all regions impacted by conflict, not just certain countries that receive more attention.
Preserve academic infrastructure and resources in conflict areas so scientists can eventually rebuild if they return.
View exiled scientists as assets who can contribute knowledge, not just charity cases needing help. Provide opportunities for meaningful research and collaboration.
Keep science as politically neutral as possible and treat all scientists equally regardless of country of origin. Avoid agenda-driven support.
Establish dedicated immigration pathways and visas specifically for threatened academics seeking refuge. Streamline visa processes.
Provide longer term placements of 2-3 years when possible, not just short stints of a few months. Give scientists time to adjust and contribute.
Expand funding and number of host institutions willing to take in at-risk academics. Make programs accessible globally.
Focus on peer support networks and mentoring to help exiled scientists deal with cultural adjustments and career transitions.
Increase awareness of scientist in exile issues among policymakers, academic institutions, funders and the general public to expand support.

* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com

2023 Conference – Science and Society

Theme: Science and Society

Pre-Conference Panels:

Symposiums:

Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Symposium

Health Policy Symposium

Conference Panels:

Panel 702

Information Overload: Exploring the challenges people face with getting to the truth in a sea of information and tools to support them

Organized by: Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada Speakers: Anthony Morgan Dr. Jaigris Hodson Dr. Nicholas Diamond Magda Byma Panel Date: October 30th, 2023

Panel 705

Fundamentals in Science Communication and Education

Organized by: Perimiter Institute Panel Date: November 3rd, 2023 Speakers: Dr. Damian Pope Dr. Emily Petroff Mark Healy

Panel 714

Impact of Science and Innovation on Society

Organized by: University of Manitoba Speakers: Dr. Dorthe Dahl-Jensen Dr. Hans-Joachim Wieden Sarah Laframboise Tarik Moroy Panel Date: November 2nd, 2023

Panel 222

Black Inclusion in STEM: Strengthening Education and Employment Pathways for Black Students, Graduates, and Professionals

Organized by: Visions of Science Panel Date: November 13th, 2023 Speakers: Angelo Nwigwe Desiree F. Sylvestre Dr. Jennifer D. Adams Dr. Maydianne Andrade Dr. Toyib Olaniyan Lisa Cole

Panel 908

Brain Health Matters: Reducing Stigma and Harnessing the Power of Knowing

Organized by: ROCHE Speakers: Dr. Alonso Montoya Dr. Gustavo Saposnik Khushbu Patel Kyle Fitzgerald Laura Tamblyn Watts Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Panel 219

Advancing inclusive science as pathway to innovative and sustainability transformations: Emerging Insights from institutional and organizational approaches

Organized by: NRCan Panel Date: November 15th, 2023 Speakers: Dr. David Nanang Dr. Doreen Churchill Dr. Effah Kwabena Antwi Dr. John Boakye-Danquah Dr. Steffany Bennett Elder Verna McGregor Trudy Samuel

Panel 226

Nouvelle loi, nouveau plan d’action pour les langues officielles : quelles avancées pour la recherche en français?

Organized by: Conseil d’administration de la Fédération des sciences humaines Speakers: Anne-José Villeneuve Annie Pilote Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault Sylvie A. Lamoureux O.Ont., Ph.D. Tanja Niemann Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

Panel 243

Evidence and Innovation Support in the Social Sector

Organized by: La Collaborative Speakers: Dr. Elicia Maine John Hepburn Marie-Claude Lagacé Michael Wilson Sandra Lapointe Ursula Gobel Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Panel 270

Partnering with the public for the co-production of knowledge: How the federal government can increase its use of citizen science to tackle grand challenges

Organized by: Health Canada and Laboratories Canada (Public Services and Procurement Canada) Speakers: Achla Joshi Dr. Beth Armstrong Dr. Shawn Marshall Erin O’Sullivan Jason Hwang Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

Panel 277

Science for Social Justice: Advancing the agenda set by the 2022 Cape Town World Science Forum

English

French

Organized by: South African Department of Science and Innovation Panel Date: November 14th, 2023 Speakers: Azeeza Rangunwala Dr. Saja Al Zoubi (She/her) Julia MacKenzie Ms. Mmampei Chaba Professor Rémi Quirion

Panel 289

A Question of Trust

Organized by: Council of Canadian Academies Speakers: Anita Melnyk Caitlin Fowler Jennifer Stoddart Marianne Mader Wendy Hui Kyong Chun Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Panel 801

Science in times of conflict: how to support and limit impact?

English

French

Organized by: Fonds de recherche du Quebec Speakers: Carole Jabet Encieh Erfani Jean Lebel Mirja Trilsch S. Karly Kehoe Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Speakers:
Anthony Morgan
Dr. Jaigris Hodson
Dr. Nicholas Diamond
Magda Byma
Panel Date: October 30th, 2023

Organized by: Perimiter Institute
Panel Date: November 3rd, 2023
Speakers:
Dr. Damian Pope
Dr. Emily Petroff
Mark Healy

Organized by: University of Manitoba
Speakers:
Dr. Dorthe Dahl-Jensen
Dr. Hans-Joachim Wieden
Sarah Laframboise
Tarik Moroy
Panel Date: November 2nd, 2023

Organized by: Visions of Science
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023
Speakers:
Angelo Nwigwe
Desiree F. Sylvestre
Dr. Jennifer D. Adams
Dr. Maydianne Andrade
Dr. Toyib Olaniyan
Lisa Cole

Organized by: ROCHE
Speakers:
Dr. Alonso Montoya
Dr. Gustavo Saposnik
Khushbu Patel
Kyle Fitzgerald
Laura Tamblyn Watts
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023

Organized by: NRCan
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023
Speakers:
Dr. David Nanang
Dr. Doreen Churchill
Dr. Effah Kwabena Antwi
Dr. John Boakye-Danquah
Dr. Steffany Bennett
Elder Verna McGregor
Trudy Samuel

Organized by: Conseil d’administration de la Fédération des sciences humaines
Speakers:
Anne-José Villeneuve
Annie Pilote
Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault
Sylvie A. Lamoureux O.Ont., Ph.D.
Tanja Niemann
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

Organized by: La Collaborative
Speakers:
Dr. Elicia Maine
John Hepburn
Marie-Claude Lagacé
Michael Wilson
Sandra Lapointe
Ursula Gobel
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Organized by: Health Canada and Laboratories Canada (Public Services and Procurement Canada)
Speakers:
Achla Joshi
Dr. Beth Armstrong
Dr. Shawn Marshall
Erin O’Sullivan
Jason Hwang
Panel Date: November 15th, 2023

Organized by: South African Department of Science and Innovation
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023
Speakers:
Azeeza Rangunwala
Dr. Saja Al Zoubi (She/her)
Julia MacKenzie
Ms. Mmampei Chaba
Professor Rémi Quirion

Organized by: Council of Canadian Academies
Speakers:
Anita Melnyk
Caitlin Fowler
Jennifer Stoddart
Marianne Mader
Wendy Hui Kyong Chun
Panel Date: November 14th, 2023

Organized by: Fonds de recherche du Quebec
Speakers:
Carole Jabet
Encieh Erfani
Jean Lebel
Mirja Trilsch
S. Karly Kehoe
Panel Date: November 13th, 2023