Canadian Science Policy Centre
1595 16th Avenue, Suite 301
Richmond Hill, ON
L4B 3N9
E-mail:
info@sciencepolicy.ca
Subscribe to the Canadian Science Policy Conference newsletter to keep up-to-date with the latest news, events and programs.
Innovation Policy refers to policies and public strategies, regulations, and initiatives aimed at promoting the development, diffusion, and application of new ideas, technologies, products, and services. It seeks to enhance capacity for innovation to drive economic growth, competitiveness, and social well-being. Innovation policy encompasses support for research and development (R&D), entrepreneurship and education, digital infrastructure, social innovation and collaboration between industry, academia, and government.
Science for Policy refers to the use of scientific knowledge, evidence, and expertise to inform and support decision-making in public policy. It involves translating complex scientific research into accessible insights that can guide the development, implementation, and evaluation of policies across various sectors, including (but not limited to) health, environment, technology, security, education, justice. Science for policy emphasizes evidence-based policymaking, where decisions are grounded in reliable data and research and knowledge rather than opinion or ideology.
Policy for Science refers to the set of governmental policies or institutional strategies, decisions, and frameworks that shape the funding, priorities, infrastructure, and governance of scientific research and development. It involves creating conditions that support scientific innovation, including investments in research institutions, training of scientists and development of science infrastructure, research integrity, EDIA, and international collaboration, ultimately aiming to strengthen the scientific enterprise to advance knowledge,economic development, and societal well-being.
Science for Policy refers to the use of scientific knowledge, evidence, and expertise to inform and support decision-making in public policy. It involves translating complex scientific research into accessible insights that can guide the development, implementation, and evaluation of policies across various sectors, including (but not limited to) health, environment, technology, security, education, justice. Science for policy emphasizes evidence-based policymaking, where decisions are grounded in reliable data and research and knowledge rather than opinion or ideology.
Science & Society refers to areas that strengthen public understanding and engagement with science, including the relationship between science and society. This includes but is not limited to science communication, education, journalism, public engagement, and citizen science and more.
Panel Abstract:
There is growing recognition that leveraging Canada’s highly educated workforce and world class learning institutions in support of innovation and productivity is smart policy, and that doing so through well-designed and targeted work-integrated learning and skills training opportunities can both help HQP realize their significant potential and drive Canadian innovation. This session will examine what makes these interventions so impactful and how they are helping HQP across Canada develop the knowledge and skills needed to succeed outside of academia, expand Canadian industry’s receptor capacity for HQP talent, and build the talent pools needed to drive inclusive and place-based innovation across the country. It will further explore how policymakers and the broader Canadian workforce development community can do more to nurture the potential of Canada’s deep pool of highly skilled HQP to drive innovation now and in the future.
Summary of Conversations:
The panel discussion focused on strategies for better preparing PhD students for careers beyond academia. Panelists argued that PhD programs need restructuring, including diversifying mentorship beyond just supervisors, building training into national initiatives, and increasing work-integrated learning opportunities. Ian advocated rethinking comprehensive exams designed for academic careers. Schweta proposed making PhD programs more competitive with fewer but better paid students. Sarah emphasized reframing innovation skills and noted limits of industry knowledge for deep science. Charlene advocated increasing graduate work placements to 80% of students. Ian and Schweta highlighted the value of peer networking and alumni mentors from diverse career fields. Schweta and Sarah discussed linking academic projects to economic needs through intersectoral collaborations. Overall, panelists agreed PhD training should be reformed to develop transferable skills, provide work experience, and expand mentorship for diverse careers.
Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:
Recommendations (or Next Steps):
* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com
Panel Abstract:
This panel brings together representatives from national organizations engaging Indigenous youth in STEM, along with students and stakeholders. Delegates will learn from firsthand experiences and gain tangible examples of successful initiatives that foster engagement and collaboration. It will discuss barriers, share best practices, tools, resources, and proven initiatives, addressing topics like Indigenous representation, barriers faced by youth, inclusive learning environments, and culturally relevant curricula. Through collaborative efforts, pre-existing resources, and sustained support, this panel aims to inspire a coordinated approach to increase Indigenous representation in STEM, fostering an inclusive and innovative workforce. Delegates will actively participate in dialogue through an interactive format.
Summary of Conversations:
The panel discusses initiatives and programs to support indigenous students in STEM fields. Speakers highlight the importance of building long-term relationships and trust with indigenous communities. Programs like Biocanorex’s internships, the Kirkness Foundation’s science camps, and Connected North’s virtual outreach aim to provide mentorship, role models, and a sense of community for indigenous youth in STEM. Challenges like lack of financial support and low university enrollment are acknowledged. Panelists emphasize the need for cultural safety, empowering indigenous voices, humility, and persisting despite obstacles. They also highlighted the importance of matching students with suitable mentors, bringing indigenous scientists into classrooms virtually, and providing ongoing engagement opportunities. The panel expresses interest in expanding successful programs while continuing efforts to build relationships and listen to indigenous communities.
Take Away Messages/ Current Status of the Challenges:
Recommendations (or Next Steps):
* Panel summary generated by OLGOO.com